Hi Spyder lovers", it's brake pad time replacement again. I have done this before and I am fimiliar with what to do I just put a pic of my rear wheel brake pads and always one wears out more than the other
My wife saw this and told me I should comment. So don't chew on my ear for this....
Brakes turn energy into heat and dissipate that heat into the atmosphere. The thinner the friction material, the less efficient they are to dissipate heat. For that reason, I change pads when they become only halfway worn. A pad that thin is going to go bye bye real fast. If it were me and I had new pads at the ready, I'd put them in. Why risk brake fade and gouging the rotor.
Before installing new pads, put a piece of sand paper on a flat surface and give them a few stokes and bevel the leading edges. Clean the rotor with brake cleaner or alcohol. Then use some 400 grit sandpaper or Scotchbright pad on them.
My dad taught me to mind the brakes more than the engine, saying; You can always make it go, but if you don't mind the brakes, you can't always make it stop. Wise man my dad.
:agree:IMHO , the brake pad manufacturer took the HEAT thing into consideration ….. however if the Pads are some kind of Chinese knock-off - all bets are off ….. Merry Christmas ….. Mikehyea:
I'm going to quibble with your wife. The pads definitely play a part in getting rid of the heat that results from converting the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle by use of friction. However, the pad itself dissipates very little heat to the atmosphere. There just simply isn't enough interface between the pad and ambient air to conduct heat. In addition to providing friction, pads have two roles, one as insulators and the other as thermal conductors. In the insulating role they provide resistance to the friction heat at the disc/pad interface from being transmitted to the pad backing steel and on to the caliper piston and brake fluid. So in this case a new full thick pad will provide more resistance than a worn thin one. So if you want to maximize this benefit change the pads at 3/4 of original, not at 1/2. But that's a ludicrous idea. So what is the minimum thickness that the brakes will function well at? How about the thickness at which brake squawkers start making noise? And we all know that is way less than 1/2 of original. Unfortunately, Spyder pads don't have squawkers, do they?Brakes turn energy into heat and dissipate that heat into the atmosphere. The thinner the friction material, the less efficient they are to dissipate heat. ..... A pad that thin is going to go bye bye real fast. If it were me and I had new pads at the ready, I'd put them in. Why risk brake fade and gouging the rotor.
Now that I did get my ears chewed, I was going on the assumption y'all knew that it's the rotor that dispels most of the heat into the atmosphere. What I was pointing out was that a too thin pad transfers more heat to the caliper and there's the risk of boiling the fluid. I have seen this happen - although not to me.
Disc brakes are a huge improvement over drums that have about 85% covered by friction material, with only about 15% doing the cooling. Whereas, disc rotors are covered about 15% and the other 85% does the cooling. Hence better braking and resistance to fading.
Re those who scorned my replacing pads at or slightly below the halfway mark; Do you wait to replace tires when they are way past the wear bars because there's still some tread there? FYI, I replace tires well above the wear bars, don't scold me for that too. It's my money and my life that I'm protecting and I did not appreciate the snarky comments. Posts can be worded in positive ways, rather than rubbing someone's nose in it. We are here to help and get help.
That theory about gouged discs is an interesting one and I'd like to see a side-by-side comparo of the braking performance between smooth rotors and gouged ones. I bet you would too.
Peace.
I trust you have heard what happens to both parties when you ass-u-me!I was going on the assumption y'all knew that it's the rotor that dispels most of the heat into the atmosphere.
I wish you would have written this earlier. Then I would have known you think the same as I do with regard to this point!What I was pointing out was that a too thin pad transfers more heat to the caliper and there's the risk of boiling the fluid. I have seen this happen - although not to me
Sorry if you feel like I was scorning as that wasn't my intent, although I suppose I was ridiculing your early replacement. To make the tires vs. pad more accurate I would say the wear bars are equivalent to brake pad squawkers. The product design is based on using them to the prescribed wear point and still retain the intended performance. The real question then becomes does early replacement buy sufficiently improved performance to justify the cost of early replacement? I'm inclined to say no.Re those who scorned my replacing pads at or slightly below the halfway mark; Do you wait to replace tires when they are way past the wear bars because there's still some tread there?
I'm sure you are right, but you see, you are dealing with a guy here who is super OCD when it comes to his vehicles and errs on the side of caution. But I will wear jeans for so long that my wife has to tell to get fresh ones out. Your apology is accepted, thanks.The real question then becomes does early replacement buy sufficiently improved performance to justify the cost of early replacement? I'm inclined to say no.
Mine were completely worn out at just over 26,000 miles. One rear pad was paper thin and one front one had just started to make metal to metal contact.Just curious how many miles are you getting on the Rear Pads?
Would it be about 25,000 to 35,000 miles?.......:thumbup:
If you are asking me, I'm on my first Spyder, got it last February and don't have many miles on it. But I can tell you that my car, a 2007 with 93K miles, still has the original pads and there's more than 50% meat left.Just curious how many miles are you getting on the Rear Pads?
Would it be about 25,000 to 35,000 miles?.......:thumbup: