StanProff
New member
Someone try and help me understand what has happened to the Spyder suspensions to regress from 2010 till now (or have they?). Frankly I am very satisfied with the way my 2010 Handles under any circumstance. I have absolutely no complaints with "body roll", tire vibrations, shaking, drifting, or any other handling problem that we seem to be getting posts on. From what I am reading, about the problems with 2014's handling, BRP has either totally screwed up or simple issues are being blown out of proportion. The 2010 RT's came out of the Box with shocks that were known to be weak, This was BRP's first foray into the touring class and it simply needed a little more stiffness to handle the extra couple of hundred pounds or so. Also "body roll" was also a concern as influenced by the added weight and by those who rode a little more aggressive in the curves, or when pulling a trailer. We wanted the Spyder to be a little more stable overall. Simple fixes (that I applied) Were, #1 the Bajaron sway bar, Anyone that was into car performance in the 60's know the difference a stiffer sway-bar can make on handling, Thanks Ron for a well thought out product. #2 upgrade, I installed fox shocks (got a really good deal on them). Same as the above statement, We always stuck Monroe or equivalent shocks on our cars or trucks to improve the handling. These accomplished all the things that a good shock is supposed to do. #3 I had Lamont do an alignment. Again just like a car, it was no longer tracking off center. (I do blame BRP on this one of course I could have hit a good bump or two the previous two years).
My question and concerns, are the '14's really overall bad handlers with bad suspensions ? Has BRP not learned anything from the previous years? Are the RT's worst now that 4 years ago? I really don't think so. It is fine if someone wants to upgrade what they have, that is what I have done but I didn't claim that the ride was factory defective or something to justify my upgrades.
A little background here: I hooked up the 622 trailer, loaded it down and my wife and I road through 14 states going across country and back. At that time the Spyder was totally stock. It rode and preformed fine for the purpose that I wanted. I did not expect it to handle like a race car on a road course. All I am saying is I think it is easy to expect much more than a particular model can give. That's why they make sport models and touring models.
With the 3 items listed that I have added or had done to my 2010 RT-S It is perfect. Front tires are on the high side of 25,000 miles with at least 5 or 6 more thousand in them. Maybe I am just lucky and have a perfectly built Spyder. Maybe it is like the thousands of more that came off the line. What ever it is, If the '14's are as bad as some say, BRP has a very big problem. I certainly hope not. I am wanting to trade up to a '15. (hey, I trade cars every 3 or 4 years too).
How about some of the owners of the new '14's speak up and give an opinion on how your ride is. I am really wanting to get more opinions. I would like to trade up, I want a touring model, I want it to be comfortable, I want it to have reasonable handling without spending money to get it that way, upgrades and farkles are great but they should not be mandatory to have a good handling and performing machine.
Thanks for your feedback.
Stan
My question and concerns, are the '14's really overall bad handlers with bad suspensions ? Has BRP not learned anything from the previous years? Are the RT's worst now that 4 years ago? I really don't think so. It is fine if someone wants to upgrade what they have, that is what I have done but I didn't claim that the ride was factory defective or something to justify my upgrades.
A little background here: I hooked up the 622 trailer, loaded it down and my wife and I road through 14 states going across country and back. At that time the Spyder was totally stock. It rode and preformed fine for the purpose that I wanted. I did not expect it to handle like a race car on a road course. All I am saying is I think it is easy to expect much more than a particular model can give. That's why they make sport models and touring models.
With the 3 items listed that I have added or had done to my 2010 RT-S It is perfect. Front tires are on the high side of 25,000 miles with at least 5 or 6 more thousand in them. Maybe I am just lucky and have a perfectly built Spyder. Maybe it is like the thousands of more that came off the line. What ever it is, If the '14's are as bad as some say, BRP has a very big problem. I certainly hope not. I am wanting to trade up to a '15. (hey, I trade cars every 3 or 4 years too).
How about some of the owners of the new '14's speak up and give an opinion on how your ride is. I am really wanting to get more opinions. I would like to trade up, I want a touring model, I want it to be comfortable, I want it to have reasonable handling without spending money to get it that way, upgrades and farkles are great but they should not be mandatory to have a good handling and performing machine.
Thanks for your feedback.
Stan