No it doesn't matter. It's just a simple topic of conversation.Does it really matter? It's a folks and strokes issue. JMO.
No it doesn't matter. It's just a simple topic of conversation.
roflmao. Mike, I think you should have left the "H" out of "IMHO".IMHO......I don't the F-3 is going to hurt the RT sales one bit.......they are apples and oranges ..........However the F-3 vs. the rest of the Spyder line-up.....Unless you are really into an antiquated , high revving , noisy , smelly , high maintenance ( cost and time ) " V " twin ./.....Then I think the F-3 is going to be the Winner.......Mike :thumbup:
Dragonrider,I've said/thought all along that the F3 is the RS/GS replacement. I don't see it as a competitor with either the ST or RT. The ST line offers crotch rocket riders a good option, and the St LTD is a decent sport touring platform. The RT is solidly the touring platform, and the F3 offers nothing to compete with any of these - it's just a cruiser.
No offense taken.Didn't mean to offend, could have omitted first sentence. My apology.
I hope to see and maybe test ride one soon, but my opinion holds as someone else stated, it looks like a lawnmower.
PK
That was Dan P. (SPYD3R) who said that the F3 looked like his John Deere riding mower. Then he took a test drive on one, and immediately pulled out his wallet and bought one on the spot!!! Maybe you'll do the same, PK.![]()
:dontknow:...Wow rob, I hadn't heard about the 1330 engine having HEAT ISSUES that needed to have body panels removed ........Anyone else out there aware of this ?????.....Mike :thumbup::thumbup:Dragonrider,
I agree with you about the RT. The RT will continue to outsell the other models, and with the 2014/2015 changes, it has reached its maturing point for a few years to come, IMO. You can't beat it for what it does.
BUT, my opinion is very different from yours with respect to both the ST and the F3. The F3 is MUCH more than "just a cruiser". It's got adjustable foot pegs to offer a comfortable ride and a riding appeal to a wide range of potential customers. It's got a light weight tubular frame and the new 1330 engine, which is what gives it so much "muscle". With the gas tank being moved forward and lower on the frame, it's got a low center of gravity, which is what makes it perform so well in the turns. It's got the open access to the engine which resolves the heat problem. In short, it is the answer to almost ALL of Can Am's problems with the rest of the model line (beyond the new RT). That's why I predict that it will replace the RS entirely, and why the ST will pick up many of its features.
The ST cannot stay the same. BRP has got to resolve the heat problem on all models and the ST suffers almost as much from those issues as the RT did. I speculate that BRP will replace the ST with a model that offers much of the same appeal that the ST now has, but it will have many of the F3 features, including the tubular frame, the lower center of gravity, the adjustable foot positions, and the 1330 engine. But, like the current ST, it will also offer saddlebag storage, a better windshield, and more comfort for the passenger. Whether they call this "new model" an ST, an F3, or something else, I believe it is the natural progression for the ST.
Mike, not sure how you got that from what I said. At least that's not what I intended to say.:dontknow:...Wow rob, I hadn't heard about the 1330 engine having HEAT ISSUES that needed to have body panels removed ........Anyone else out there aware of this ?????.....Mike :thumbup::thumbup:
.............In the the Post from you that I QUOTED.......you were talking about the ...F- 3...( which has the 1330 engine ) you cont'd. with and since it doesn't have the PANELS........ that solves the " HEAT PROBLEM " !!!!.................I thought you were linking the 1330 with the " HEAT PROBLEM " ( In my.... NOT humble ....opinion ) :roflblack::roflblack::roflblack:............Mike :thumbup:Mike, not sure how you got that from what I said. At least that's not what I intended to say.![]()