I brought my Spyder into the dealership this morning to get some work done (the latch on one of the side cases on my RT broke when I tried to open the case, and the case will not open at all) and the dealer provided me with a loaner while my trike is being worked on. I had to sign a waiver for the loaner, and the paperwork seemed to be a standard form of several pages, used for loaners and demo rides. Included in the verbiage was a section where it stated acknowledging several things about the Spyder, such as that it is wider than a motorcycle, that it has a brake pedal controlling all three brakes, and some other pretty obvious stuff. But it also included this as a "fact", saying (or in words very close to this) "I recognize that the Spyder is not a motorcycle". I'm not sure why Can Am or the dealer included this statement of this wording, rather than saying "traditional two wheel motorcycle" or something similar to that. Seems to me that many Spyder riders who have never ridden traditional motorcycles, and/or do not want to go to the effort of learning how to safely operate a two wheel motorcycle (such as learning to use the "friction zone" of the clutch, learning to simultaneously use both hands and both feet in emergency braking, etc) like to think of the Spyder as a motorcycle. Telling a potential customer to accept that it is NOT a motorcycle seems both foolish and counterproductive.