I apologize if you are reading this a second time. The first time I posted it the reply section of a thread I had started regarding the correct headlamp bulbs for the RT. (I am a real noob two weeks)
I thought I would repost it to a wider audience in hopes someone can shed some light on the issue. (pun intended) -
In my previous post on this forum I asked about the headlamps in the 2013 RTS. Even though riding at night is an 'unnatural act' as all the grip disappears from the road ( same thing happens in flying darkness destroys the 'lift' in the air) occasionally I ride at night. Since the days are getting shorter I would like as much light as possible. New bulbs are a very inexpensive upgrade.
I was going to do the EBAY HID shufle but there is a lot of negative comments about HID's in a non-HID reflector so I looked more.
After all my research I found that 9011 HIR bulbs have about 50% more lumens than a standard hb3/9005. From all the scare tactics about glare and light scatter from HID's without an HID compatible reflector I decided that would not be a good option. Laying a $grand$ out for the BRP HID retro which contains new reflectors (I presume with correct optics for HID's) was not something I want to do right now. Looks like a simple mod to make a 9011 (ostensibly exactly the same as an hb3/9005 except for 1 tab on the base) fit in an hb3 hole so I am leaning that way.
Then I stumbled across some more 'research' in regard to HID's. (More research is likened to Confucian saying: 'Man who has watch knows what time it is. Man who has two watches is never sure.')
Hang on there is a question in here somewhere.
What I found out is that the operative difference between a low beam and a high beam bulb is that the low beam has a shield or hat to keep some of the light from scattering and a high beam does not. Therefore the 9005 high beam on a reflector (Spyder) would be essentially like an HID bulb. Meaning no cap/shield whatever you want to call it.
So here is the question(s): The Spyder uses the high beam bulb and a mechanical shutter to mask the 9005/HB3 beam to 'low' beam rather than two wattages or a 2/2 low high beam setup correct?
If so - then HID bulb would be affected by the shutter in the same way? That is not spewing glare all over like an HID in a standard low beam reflector. The pattern would be cutoff as necessary to keep the pattern low when the shutter is activated and moves down (up)?
Has anyone patterned their HID conversion (non BRP) to see if the shutter does indeed give a proper 'cut off' pattern.
Sorry but I am an 'incurable tinkering dweeb' when it comes to things mechanical.
Thanks in advance!
I thought I would repost it to a wider audience in hopes someone can shed some light on the issue. (pun intended) -
In my previous post on this forum I asked about the headlamps in the 2013 RTS. Even though riding at night is an 'unnatural act' as all the grip disappears from the road ( same thing happens in flying darkness destroys the 'lift' in the air) occasionally I ride at night. Since the days are getting shorter I would like as much light as possible. New bulbs are a very inexpensive upgrade.
I was going to do the EBAY HID shufle but there is a lot of negative comments about HID's in a non-HID reflector so I looked more.
After all my research I found that 9011 HIR bulbs have about 50% more lumens than a standard hb3/9005. From all the scare tactics about glare and light scatter from HID's without an HID compatible reflector I decided that would not be a good option. Laying a $grand$ out for the BRP HID retro which contains new reflectors (I presume with correct optics for HID's) was not something I want to do right now. Looks like a simple mod to make a 9011 (ostensibly exactly the same as an hb3/9005 except for 1 tab on the base) fit in an hb3 hole so I am leaning that way.
Then I stumbled across some more 'research' in regard to HID's. (More research is likened to Confucian saying: 'Man who has watch knows what time it is. Man who has two watches is never sure.')
Hang on there is a question in here somewhere.

What I found out is that the operative difference between a low beam and a high beam bulb is that the low beam has a shield or hat to keep some of the light from scattering and a high beam does not. Therefore the 9005 high beam on a reflector (Spyder) would be essentially like an HID bulb. Meaning no cap/shield whatever you want to call it.
So here is the question(s): The Spyder uses the high beam bulb and a mechanical shutter to mask the 9005/HB3 beam to 'low' beam rather than two wattages or a 2/2 low high beam setup correct?
If so - then HID bulb would be affected by the shutter in the same way? That is not spewing glare all over like an HID in a standard low beam reflector. The pattern would be cutoff as necessary to keep the pattern low when the shutter is activated and moves down (up)?
Has anyone patterned their HID conversion (non BRP) to see if the shutter does indeed give a proper 'cut off' pattern.
Sorry but I am an 'incurable tinkering dweeb' when it comes to things mechanical.

Thanks in advance!