We've been using 10% ethanol here in Minnesota for several years. Questions about the "unknown" ethanol blends were raised here years ago, and other than some very old equipment, it has proven to pretty much be a non-issue. Yes, it has less energy per volume so the MPG is not quite as good. Yes, it absorbs water so it will suck the crap out of your gas tank (and works great as a fuel de-icer in the winter). Yes, it does require slight larger (carb) main jets on two-strokes that are tuned to the max. Yes, it tends to dry out some gasket materials. But these have proven to be more isolated and less frequently a problem than predicted, and is now pretty much a non-issue after what almost ten years now?
We just don't even worry about the ethanol fuel blend anymore. It would have to be a pre-1995 engine for me to even raise an eyebrow if I had a fuel-system or related issue, other than the gas going "bad" or "stale" (loss of light ends, bacteria growth or formation of gum/varnish). This remains an issue with most all of the new fuel formulations, including the ethanol blends. "Gas gone bad" is far more of a concern than what the ethanol will do in everyday daily use. At least here in snowy Minnesota. We try to use it within 30 days. 90+ and it is suspect, for sure. The EPA fiddles with the gas formulas to reduce emissions, things like evaporative rates and such. It doesn't stay "fresh" like it used to. I think this is common across the board, ethanol blends and straight gas.
Some stations in MN do still offer a non-ethanol premium that is intended for collector cars (old engines) and off-road vehicles, great for piped and carbed sleds. Boating and sled types seem to maintain the demand for this product availability. I guess that means two-strokes.......
One point is that we're putting money into the pockets of corn farmers of America instead of into the pockets of the middle east, russia, brazil, where ever. To keep that money in the U.S. economy, assuming all other things being equal, should be a huge asset alone. But I'm told the oil companies control the distribution of the ethanol (has to be mixed with their gas), so they're still getting their "cut".
Is it cleaner? That is still questionable. Depends on the measurement method. It also takes a lot of fuel to make a gallon of ethanol, and it takes a lot of water to make a gallon of ethanol. You get into a food vs. fuel argument, along with consuming the ground water and depleting the soil of nutrients......or, farmers planting corn instead of beans or wheat affects those markets, and less corn means higher feed prices (beef, pork)...on and on.
We have a joke around here at the liquor stores - "No gas in our alcohol".