I would assume nothing of the sort. Mesuring the thickness is your best bet. The brake pad minimum thickness is 1 mm (0.040"). When they approach that they should be replaced.I've noticed, looking at the pads on my RT, that there is a small slot in the face of the front pads, I assume that this is a wear indicator? As I can still see the slot, I assume the pads still have some miles left on them.
I would assume nothing of the sort. Mesuring the thickness is your best bet. The brake pad minimum thickness is 1 mm (0.040"). When they approach that they should be replaced.
It could have a purpose in the Spyder manufacturing process, Be an artifact of the pad manufacturing process, be there for venting purposes, or for noise reduction purposes. If BRP does not say it is a wear indicator, I would not use it as such before I measured it to see how it compares to the 1 mm spec.Question? If it's not a wear indicator, than what's the purpose of a slot on the face of the pad?
Actually a nickel is 1.95 mm thick. Even a dime is 1.35, but that's close enough to the mark to use as a judge. It isn't a good idea to go right down to the spec, anyway. Be aware that the pads may not wear evenly, so a prt you can't readily see could be thinner. Best to start measuring when the thickness approaches that of a dime.:agree: one millimeter; the thickness of a nickel... that's what you need. :thumbup:
It could have a purpose in the Spyder manufacturing process, Be an artifact of the pad manufacturing process, be there for venting purposes, or for noise reduction purposes. If BRP does not say it is a wear indicator, I would not use it as such before I measured it to see how it compares to the 1 mm spec.
Generic information tells us nothing. Vehicles where the manufacturing slot also serves as a wear indicator say so in their service manuals. The Spyder manual says no such thing. Since there are also manufacturing slots that do not double as wear indicators, thinking that the Spyder does so is merely speculation. Suit yourself, but don't encourage others to make the mistake of not measuring. It could have expensive, or even hazardous, results.For what it's worth:
Signs of Brake Pad Wear
Believe it or not, most of the time you can check pad wear without taking off the wheels. And you don't need a mechanical engineering degree to do it. Usually, you can see the brake pad through the wheel and won't need to remove it. Once you find the brake pad, notice its thickness. If it appears to be very thin, it's almost used up. Some brake pads have a slot in the center that serves several engineering purposes, but also doubles as a wear indicator. Check to see how much of that slot is left. If it's almost gone, you need new pads [source: CDX eTextbook].
Generic information tells us nothing. Vehicles where the manufacturing slot also serves as a wear indicator say so in their service manuals. The Spyder manual says no such thing. Since there are also manufacturing slots that do not double as wear indicators, thinking that the Spyder does so is merely speculation. Suit yourself, but don't encourage others to make the mistake of not measuring. It could have expensive, or even hazardous, results.
Since we are on the topic of brake pads....I am a new Spyder owner. Just bought my 2008 GS a few weeks ago. Did a pre-sale inspection and everything was fantastic. I just took my Spyder back to Procaliber for squeaky brakes. They said that the pads were fine but they needed the updated brake pads. ?????? They tried to explain this to me but I’m still scratching my head:dontknow:. I am not a mechanic....can anyone explain this to me?
Shannon