• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Belt tensioner position, which is correct, top or bottom?

paultt

New member
I am looking to build a belt tensioner for my RS. I have an extensive shop.
I have trawled though all the forums, learnt a little bit. Tensioner position is never mentioned.
I am wondering if having the tensioner mounted on the top run of the belt, the drive or tension side, is the best place for it? Surely the slack in the belt would be in the bottom run? So that should be the place to apply the tensioner?
Your thoughts please people.
thanks Paul
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know anything about the RS's; but the tensioner runs on the top of the belt on the RT's. Not sure how much engineering goes into a belt tensioner to determine the correct amount of leverage, but I think I'd just buy one from one of our forum sponsors as they've probably done their homework.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tensioner is a misnomer. It is actually a harmonic dampener. That is the reason it runs on the top of the belt, as that is where you are most likely to get the resonance. All of the solutions out there have the roller running on top.
 
IMHO, due to more than a few product failures, as reported on this forum (which is likely to ruin the drive belt!) I won't use one - Period! I lowered my belt tension to 160 lbs (measured with the wheel on the ground) and I no longer feel any Vibes at any speeds... Good luck! ..... Mike :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've had a bottom one and top one. Top works better. I think a solid idler pully would work better like you see on automotive drive fan belts. With large heavy duty bearings. One on top and bottom. That would act as if the belt was half the size. Bet there wouldn't be any vibes at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've had top and bottom. I prefer top. Instead of using the small roller and bearing, which by design rotate at very high rpm, I am using a timing belt pulley from a Hyundai Sonoma. It is 2" in diameter with a very high-quality bearing. It's been working well for several years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've had top and bottom. I prefer top. Instead of using the small roller and bearing, which by design rotate at very high rpm, I am using a timing belt pulley from a Hyundai Sonoma. It is 2" in diameter with a very high-quality bearing. It's been working well for several years.

Picture? Part number? Also, does it fit the BRP tensioner arm?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Picture? Part number? Also, does it fit the BRP tensioner arm?

I don't have a part number. It is a timing belt pulley from a 2005 Hyundai Santa Fe. Do not confuse with the serpentine belt idler pulley.

20201020_144911.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Grandpot, it looks like you have Doc Humphreys tension arm on there?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, JP58, I do. The roller and bearing now turn at half the speed the original did. The larger diameter, smooth roller doesn't whine as it rolls over the ribs on the old-style belts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I sure wish you could come up with the part number or where it could be purchased.

Go to an autoparts store and tell them you want a timing belt tension pulley for a 2005 Hyundai Sant Fe with a 2.7L engine. You don't need a part number.
 
Back
Top