I took the rear break caliper off and reassembled it. My 3 questions on reassembly references the manual's "brake pad pin" instructions. See picture.
1) The nomenclature referencing seems off. In the picture the manual identifies item 2 as a "retaining screw", but the torque specification refers to "Brake Pad Pins". I assume these names apply to the same component. Are they the same?
2) If I've identified the right part, the torque value seems high at 34 lbf-ft. Can that small torx pad pin take 34 lbf-ft?
3) Not stated in the manual, but I assume the torque value applies to the front "pad pins". Is this so?
When I removed the "pad pin" it broke with little force and had no loctite on it. My motorcycle pad pins use 13 lbf-ft with no loctite and require much more force than I used on this pin.
Right now I have a lot less than 34 lbf-ft on the "Pad Pin". If I have this wrong it's an easy fix when I have confidence 34 lbf-ft won't break the "pad pin" or strip the threads in the caliper.
Larger calipers on autos use this kind of torque but on this small caliper it seems wrong.
Thanks for your thoughts.
1) The nomenclature referencing seems off. In the picture the manual identifies item 2 as a "retaining screw", but the torque specification refers to "Brake Pad Pins". I assume these names apply to the same component. Are they the same?
2) If I've identified the right part, the torque value seems high at 34 lbf-ft. Can that small torx pad pin take 34 lbf-ft?
3) Not stated in the manual, but I assume the torque value applies to the front "pad pins". Is this so?
When I removed the "pad pin" it broke with little force and had no loctite on it. My motorcycle pad pins use 13 lbf-ft with no loctite and require much more force than I used on this pin.
Right now I have a lot less than 34 lbf-ft on the "Pad Pin". If I have this wrong it's an easy fix when I have confidence 34 lbf-ft won't break the "pad pin" or strip the threads in the caliper.
Larger calipers on autos use this kind of torque but on this small caliper it seems wrong.
Thanks for your thoughts.