-
Registered Users
poor fuel milage
only had my rt a short while driven only 1600 mi only getting 25 mi to the gal is this about right ?
-
-
-
I'm averaging about 30. 1100 miles, 240 lbs. mixed driving
-
Very Active Member
I've averaged around 30mpg's... and this includes my RT-622 trailer fully loaded.
Keep in mind that the is not like your average motorcycle. It is not designed for fuel saving. Once you get used to running your machine and it gets more milage, you will see that the MPG's will improve.
Oh, and
May all your encounters with the law begin with the words: "nice trike!".[/B]
2015 Can-Am Spyder F3-S SM-6 Can-am Red/Black SM-6 with 2010 Black RT-622 trailer (hitch in the works).
Previously owned:
2010 Can-Am Spyder RT SM-5
2011 Can-Am Spyder RS-S SM-5
2013 Can-Am Spyder RT-S SM-5
-
Gas mileage can be expected to improve up to about 10,000 miles as the engine loosens up.
-
Very Active Member
-
Motorbike Professor
It's a little low, but it usually improves after the Spyder gets a few thousand miles on it. I have averaged 29 mpg over the last 21K miles with my RT, so you are close. Some get more than 30, some less, but 30 is pretty typical. As was said, your mileage depends on a lot of things, including the local gas quality.
-Scotty
2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder
Mutant Trikes Forever!
-
I get between 34 and 37 mpg's and that is over almost 6,000 miles.
-
Your typical cruising speed affects these things at the pump by a whole bunch... They push a lot of air around with that wide front end. The faster you go; the faster the fuel runs through those troublesome throttle-bodies!
-
Registered Users
My mileage stunk until I figured out that I was over filling the fuel tank. I kept trying to get it to overflow so I would know where full really is. All I was doing was filling the vapor canister and pissing as much as a gallon or so away. This forum straightened me out. Just got back yesterday from 1300 miles of riding in 2+ days, averaged 35 mpg. Just fill it till you see it at the top of the neck then stop.
-
Now that I've gotten almost 10K on my RT, my mileage is on the upswing. The past three or four fill-ups, I've averaged right around 33mpg.
-
RT-S PE#0031
25 sounds right to me. When on the interstate @ about 78 MPH pulling my trailer, I average around 21. I've gotten as high as 36 and as low as 18.4
A\It all depends on the right hand and road and weather conditions.
Mark & Mary Lou Lawson
Snellville, GA USA
'10 RT-S PE #0031
'10 RT-622 Trailer
'08 Yellow SM5 #2332
'01 Black GL1800A Goldwing #0930
"Remember in the darkness what you have learned in the light." - Joe Bayly
-
Gas Milage
I am using Fuelly.com. I have 73 fill ups for an average of 26.9 with about 6500 miles. I will sure be glad when I see a little better gas milage. When I pull my trailer I get between 21 and 24 mpg. I love the bike but the gas milage really has been less than satisfying. If you look on fuelly for the can-am i think that will give you a real feel for what people are actually getting. So what if someone tells you they got 30 mpg, its what they get over many fuel ups that really count. It seems to me that mid 20's is a more realistic mpg to expect.
-
Very Active Member
poor fuel milage
Ive been using Fuelly as well with over 100 fill ups and about 9500 miles tracked.
Average mpg is 29.1
http://www.fuelly.com/driver/arrmiha...io-convenience
Looking at the graph it is quite clear that in the hot summer months here, my mpg drops by about 4 mpg. In cooler months, I saw over 30 mpg. Its amazing how much difference air temperature can have on fuel economy.
As a note, I have never pulled a trailer.
-
Motorbike Professor
Originally Posted by Arr MiHardies
.....Looking at the graph it is quite clear that in the hot summer months here, my mpg drops by about 4 mpg. In cooler months, I saw over 30 mpg. Its amazing how much difference air temperature can have on fuel economy.
It's not all the air temperature. Fuels are formulated differently in the summer and winter. In the summer, the EPA requires them to be less volatile, to reduce evaporative emissions. Less volatility means less heat capacity, which means worse fuel mileage. Much the same effect that adding that stinking ethanol has. There is a trade-off. Colder, denser air in the winter requires more fuel to achive the same air-fuel ratio, so there is a bit of a reduction in that sense. The end result is that seasonal mileage variations are a very localized effect, different for you than for me.
-Scotty
2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder
Mutant Trikes Forever!
-
Very Active Member
I have only checked my milage once. I reset the trip meter after fill up, went 124 miles and took 3.2 gallons. I filled up the second time like I did the first. I could of been off a tenth or so. My riding was with my wife and I and averaging 45 to 50 mph. At least half the time we were cruising in 4th gear, with cruise control on. I haven't tried to see what I will get on the turnpike. The speed limit where I live is 75 mph. I will be finding out this weekend.
-
Very Active Member
I can range from 25 to a high of 34 depending on how fast I drive, city vs highway, where I buy the fuel, how much wieght I carry, windshield up or down and time of year.
-
When I first got mine, I was around 24. Now at 3600 miles, I'm around 28-30
-
Very Active Member
poor fuel milage
Originally Posted by NancysToy
It's not all the air temperature. Fuels are formulated differently in the summer and winter. In the summer, the EPA requires them to be less volatile, to reduce evaporative emissions. Less volatility means less heat capacity, which means worse fuel mileage. Much the same effect that adding that stinking ethanol has. There is a trade-off. Colder, denser air in the winter requires more fuel to achive the same air-fuel ratio, so there is a bit of a reduction in that sense. The end result is that seasonal mileage variations are a very localized effect, different for you than for me.
Colder air is denser as you mentioned, but it is much easier to cause an ignition when there is more air available. Because the air is denser and thus more abundant, more air fits within the combustion chamber, making ignition easier. Should require less fuel. Air density at 120° is about 20% lower than density at 30° (this is not an exaggerated seasonal temperature difference for Vegas). This is an almost direct correlation to the approximately 20% decrease in fuel milage I see in the summer months. Instead of adding more fuel to achieve the needed fuel to air ratio, wouldn't it make more sense to allow less air in instead to achieve the desired ratio?
-
Motorbike Professor
Originally Posted by Arr MiHardies
Colder air is denser as you mentioned, but it is much easier to cause an ignition when there is more air available. Because the air is denser and thus more abundant, more air fits within the combustion chamber, making ignition easier. Should require less fuel. Air density at 120° is about 20% lower than density at 30° (this is not an exaggerated seasonal temperature difference for Vegas). This is an almost direct correlation to the approximately 20% decrease in fuel milage I see in the summer months. Instead of adding more fuel to achieve the needed fuel to air ratio, wouldn't it make more sense to allow less air in instead to achieve the desired ratio?
Unfortunately, the sensors and the fuel maps work only off the air pressure and temperature (indirectly calculating air density) and a fixed air-fuel ratio in the mapping. The ECM fine tunes this under certain conditions. How well the mixture fires in the cylinder doesn't matter...only whether or not there is excess fuel in the exhaust during closed loop operation. Perhaps a system could be designed to monitor combustion efficiency and compensate for it, but it doesn't exist on the Spyder. Also keep in mind that the air temperature is not the combustion chamber temperature, which is quite constant once the engine warms up, so combustion efficiencies remain fairly constant. The ratio you have seen is merely coincidence, IMO.
-Scotty
2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder
Mutant Trikes Forever!
-
Originally Posted by NancysToy
Unfortunately, the sensors and the fuel maps work only off the air pressure and temperature (indirectly calculating air density) and a fixed air-fuel ratio in the mapping. The ECM fine tunes this under certain conditions. How well the mixture fires in the cylinder doesn't matter...only whether or not there is excess fuel in the exhaust during closed loop operation. Perhaps a system could be designed to monitor combustion efficiency and compensate for it, but it doesn't exist on the Spyder. Also keep in mind that the air temperature is not the combustion chamber temperature, which is quite constant once the engine warms up, so combustion efficiencies remain fairly constant. The ratio you have seen is merely coincidence, IMO.
Wouldn't the combustion chamber temp vary with the type of driving? I know my EGT's go way up under hard acceleration.
-
Motorbike Professor
Originally Posted by shelbydave
Wouldn't the combustion chamber temp vary with the type of driving? I know my EGT's go way up under hard acceleration.
It can, but the chamber temp doesn't vary as much as you think. The water-cooled head keeps things pretty constant. The exhaust gas temp is another story, that can vary considerably.
-Scotty
2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder
Mutant Trikes Forever!
-
Registered Users
Hi Scotty,
I claim no intelligent knowledge in this conversation. What do you think about the Power Commander V With Auto Tune?
Number One: 2008 Yellow GS SM5. I love my Spyder.
Number Two: 2012 RT-S Limited (the poop colored RT) I still have Number One, but Some Girl made me buy Number Two...
-
Registered Users
we have a 2010 rts-se5 limited ...it started with low mileage also about 26 mpg...at about 10000 miles it increased to 31 mpg...at 15000 miles we put a k+n air filter and a good exhaust on it and now get close to 38 mpg ... thats with me n the wife on it.. we now have 22000 miles on this unit and are thrilled and will never own any other machine but a spyder...so b patient it will come around...also shifting rpms are everything....AK is right around 5000 rpms is an excellent rpm to run the unit at ,,shifting and cruising...be a gentle and safe rider and dont abuse this unit and you will get a life time of pleasure ...good luck and happy riding!!!!
Last edited by rock; 09-24-2012 at 03:59 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|