Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 56
  1. #1
    SpyderLovers Founder Lamonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    15,858
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default RT Hitch removal and belt adjustment

    These are questions that come up all the time so I decided that since I needed to make some adjustments on my belt I would go ahead and take some pics and add captions to answer some of the questions that have been posted here many times before. As they say a picture is worth a 1000 words so I hope this will cut down on my typing.

    You start by removing the through bolt that holds the hitch on.


    This bolt should slide right out after the nut is removed from the right side.


    Now you're ready to remove the hitch after the bolt is removed.


    The hitch is going to be on there pretty tight so grab the ball and move it side to side till it breaks loose. Then pull it straight back being careful of the brake line and sensor wire on the right side.


    This shouldn't take much more than 5 min. to get the hitch off. Took me a little longer as you can tell by the time stamp.


    The last time my dealer did a tire change and belt tension check I got out my Krikit and marked it where he had it set with the sonic gauge. This has worked well for me for many years and you can pick these up for about $20 bucks.


    When the Spyder is on the ground go ahead and loosen the axle nut. When you have the Spyder in the air you can start making adjustments. As you can see from the picture I have the belt just off of the sprocket flange about 1-2mm. This can be a fight some times and you're better off making small adjustments to start with as it doesn't take much to move the belt.


    After I get the belt where I like it I check the tension while it's on the ground it should be a little more when it's on the ground because the swingarm is now more inline with the counter sprocket.




    I don't know how many times I've been asked about removing the hitch bolt from folks that thought it was the axle. This picture is just to show you that the axle is under the hitch and removing the hitch bolt has no effect on the belt tension.

  2. #2
    Very Active Member BLUEKNIGHT911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central VERMONT
    Posts
    20,272
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default BELT TENSION

    Lamont, thanks for this thread......What if you want to just decrease or increase total belt tension without moving the belt either right or left.....I know this may sound stupid but maybe someone else is slightly confused....I know there is slack in the adjusters how do compensate for that.?.......thanks again Mike...

  3. #3

    MOgang Member & Monster Member

    SteveMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Jackson, Missouri
    Posts
    2,885
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Great Tutorial and Excellent Writeup!

  4. #4
    SpyderLovers Founder Lamonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    15,858
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUEKNIGHT911 View Post
    Lamont, thanks for this thread......What if you want to just decrease or increase total belt tension without moving the belt either right or left.....I know this may sound stupid but maybe someone else is slightly confused....I know there is slack in the adjusters how do compensate for that.?.......thanks again Mike...
    I would loosen th axle nut
    Jack the Spyder up
    Back the adjusting bolts 1/4 turn at a time
    Rotate the tire forward
    Lower the Spyder back on the ground to put tension on the belt
    Raise it back up and check tension
    Repete till you have it where you like it

  5. #5
    Teddys favorite human CyncySpyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Covington Kentucky/Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    5,139
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Question Just one more reason WE LOVE this SITE so dang much, THANK YOU for Share'n Lamont

    I really Wonder if BRP realizes just how Valuable this forum has been, and continues to be on a daily basis for the Majority of Grateful Spyder Owners Thanks to such knowledgeable members such as yourself sharing with the masses Teddy & I THANK YOU, LAMONT

  6. #6
    Invalid Emails
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Jackson, Michigan
    Posts
    1,245
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    I'm looking to buy one of these hitches used if anybody's got one they want to part with.

  7. #7
    Invalid Emails
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Arcadia, FL
    Posts
    43
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default Question for Lamont

    Is the 150# reading typical when the rear wheel is off the ground and the 200# reading when the has the rear wheel on the ground? Thanks for the great tip and the reference to the Kirkit tool. I found one with a 100-300 pound range and ordered that bad boy.

  8. #8
    Very Active Member IGETAROUND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kalamazoo, Mi
    Posts
    1,819
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Here is a short u-tube video showing how to properly use the Kirkit tool



    All the great movements in the world began with a cup of coffee!

    2018 F3-T


    My mods: Can am Trailer hitch, USB and 12 volt power outlets, Gustason windshield, Bead rider seat cushion, battery harness for electric gear and battery tender, Time out trailer.
    2018 F3-T , Pearl White

  9. #9
    Very Active Member BLUEKNIGHT911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central VERMONT
    Posts
    20,272
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default LAMONT & IGETAROUND

    Thankyou very much , both of you that krikit video was SUPER INFORMATIVE the thing is useless or even dangerous if not used properly..Mike .....

  10. #10
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milehigh City
    Posts
    1,169
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CyncySpyder View Post
    I really Wonder if BRP realizes just how Valuable this forum has been, and continues to be on a daily basis for the Majority of Grateful Spyder Owners Thanks to such knowledgeable members such as yourself sharing with the masses Teddy & I THANK YOU, LAMONT
    Thank you thank you!!!

  11. #11
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Lightbulb Belt Tension Limits per Midwest Manuals pg 483

    According to Service Bulletin 2010-6 the "new" factory tension is supposed to be:
    450 +/- 150 Newtons
    (or a minimum of 300 to a maximum of 600 Newtons)

    Conversion Math:
    Newtons multiplied by 0.225 = Pounds
    OR, Newtons divided by 4.45 = Pounds


    Newtons Belt Tension Converted to Pounds:

    300 Newtons = 67.4 lbs
    450 Newtons = 101.2 lbs
    600 Newtons = 134.9 lbs

    However, this does not mean what you should be getting. It simply shows the difference between the numbers the dealer uses versus what may seem an easy mathematical "conversion".

    WHY
    BRP chose to measure the belt tension with an expensive piece of equipment is up for grabs! After all, tension is tension. They just chose an expensive way of measuring it.

    IMHO, if you used an expensive sonic tester to measure an "x" amount of Newtons, then that number will have a mathematical equivelent in pounds which logically may be measured by a more "Owner Friendly" means. Conversely, if one were to tension a belt to "x" pounds it would also have a reflective newton value.

    ***Thanks Scotty for the updated limits! I was not aware of them when I made my original post.
    Last edited by SpyderFun; 05-03-2012 at 10:14 AM. Reason: ***Reflects SB 2010-6***

  12. #12
    Motorbike Professor NancysToy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Allegan, MI
    Posts
    20,514
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpyderFun View Post
    According to MWM the factory tension is supposed to be:
    750 +/- 250 Newtons
    (or a minimum of 500 to a maximum of 1,000 Newtons)

    Conversion Math:
    Newtons multiplied by 0.225 = Pounds
    OR, Newtons divided by 4.45 = Pounds


    Newtons Belt Tension Converted to Pounds:

    500 Newtons = 112.4 Pounds
    750 Newtons = 168.6 Pounds
    1,000 Newtons = 224.8 Pounds

    I hope this helps those that have questions about what numbers they should be getting.

    IMHO, if you used an expensive sonic tester to measure an "x" amount of Newtons, then that number will have a mathematical equivelent in pounds which may be measured by a more "Owner Friendly" means.
    The belt tension spec was changed to 450 N +/- 150 N, per Service Bulletin 2010-6. Do not use the old tension spec, it will destroy the front sprocket and possibly the drive shaft. Also be aware that the BRP spec is the average of three readings taken at different places on the belt, and is read with the Spyder jacked up. Changes of conditions will change the readings. Theoretically, you cannot directly convert sonic meter readings, since they take belt width, span, and mass into account, while mere "scales" do not. The best method is to have the belt properly adjusted, then take baseline readings with an alternate meter, to get a target.
    -Scotty
    2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
    2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
    2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder



    Mutant Trikes Forever!

  13. #13
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default POST UPDATED

    Updated my post with info provided by Scotty....

  14. #14
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NancysToy View Post
    ....Theoretically, you cannot directly convert sonic meter readings, since they take belt width, span, and mass into account, while mere "scales" do not.

    Not sure I agree.
    BEGINNING with a sonic measurement, which takes in all the belt info to determine a value, and then converting THAT number should work. BRP gives us their acceptable "sonic" range.
    BUT, beginning with a tension and then trying to convert THAT, a number that takes no belt info into consideration, into a sonic equivalent would likely prove difficult if not impossible.
    It would nice if some shop did a compareison between these two methods! (i.e. a Kriket tensioned belt of "x" when "plucked" would give a "y" sonic value)


    Quote Originally Posted by NancysToy View Post
    ...The best method is to have the belt properly adjusted, then take baseline readings with an alternate meter, to get a target.
    Last edited by SpyderFun; 05-03-2012 at 10:21 AM.

  15. #15
    Motorbike Professor NancysToy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Allegan, MI
    Posts
    20,514
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpyderFun View Post
    Not sure I agree.
    BEGINNING with a sonic measurement, which takes in all the belt info to determine a value, and then converting THAT number should work. BRP gives us their acceptable "sonic" range.
    BUT, beginning with a tension and then trying to convert THAT, a number that takes no belt info into consideration, into a sonic equivalent would likely prove difficult if not impossible.
    It would nice if some shop did a compareison between these two methods! (i.e. a Kriket tensioned belt of "x" when "plucked" would give a "y" sonic value)
    It should work, and it is probably close, considering the OEM spec is now +/- 33%. I would also like to see a comparison of readings taken jacked up and on the ground.
    -Scotty
    2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
    2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
    2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder



    Mutant Trikes Forever!

  16. #16
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NancysToy View Post
    It should work, and it is probably close, considering the OEM spec is now +/- 33%. I would also like to see a comparison of readings taken jacked up and on the ground.

    I would add that +/- 33% is some SERIOUS "Slop Factor" for a company with roots in aviation and an engine company who make aircraft engines!
    Seems the engineers were way off on their initial "spec" numbers for belt tension.
    Makes one wonder what else they have "mis-calculated"?


  17. #17
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Lightbulb Under Tensioned Belt, Poor Alignment & Rear Wheel Torque

    My belt was "flapping" and made for a terrible ride due to the vibration it put off. Too much "flap" under a load can cause the belt to skip over either the drive gear or wheel sprocket. Either could cause premature wear and failure.
    A properly tensioned belt should be SMOOTH and not flapping.
    However, there is a line between proper and over tension do not cross it or unseen wear may result.

    I found my belt was so under tensioned it gave me no reading on the Krikit (<100 lbs) and failed to have any clearance from the rear wheel sprocket and the rear wheel axle nut was not torqued to spec!

    Seems we Owners are going to have to keep a sharp eye on our "professional mechanics"!

  18. #18
    Very Active Member StanProff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Jonesborough Tennessee
    Posts
    1,295
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lamonster View Post
    I would loosen th axle nut
    Jack the Spyder up
    Back the adjusting bolts 1/4 turn at a time
    Rotate the tire forward
    Lower the Spyder back on the ground to put tension on the belt
    Raise it back up and check tension
    Repete till you have it where you like it
    Is there anything wrong with placing the floor jack under the shock/mount and get the tire just an inch off the concrete? Seems this would keep the tension on the belt same as on the ground.

    Also I have played with it in the last few days on alignment and have run in 3rd gear with it jacked up and have not had a Limp mode. (I seen mention of this somewhere, that if the rear wheel is moving and the front is not that you will get a limp mode). Mine is a 2010 Rt-S. If it is pointed in a straight line I don't think the computer cares, kinda like doing a burn out etc. I wouldn't abuse mine that way but I've seen it done.
    Happy Spyderlovers

  19. #19
    Registered Users SpyderFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    488
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default Alignment or Tension???

    Quote Originally Posted by StanProff View Post
    Is there anything wrong with placing the floor jack under the shock/mount and get the tire just an inch off the concrete? Seems this would keep the tension on the belt same as on the ground.

    Also I have played with it in the last few days on alignment and have run in 3rd gear with it jacked up and have not had a Limp mode. (I seen mention of this somewhere, that if the rear wheel is moving and the front is not that you will get a limp mode). Mine is a 2010 Rt-S. If it is pointed in a straight line I don't think the computer cares, kinda like doing a burn out etc. I wouldn't abuse mine that way but I've seen it done.

    Are you doing a belt alignment or belt tension?

    Jacking under the rear shock is a no-no per the maintenance manual.

    Not too sure why you would go as high as 3rd gear when 1st gear can give you the rotation necessary for determining proper alignment.

  20. #20
    Very Active Member StanProff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Jonesborough Tennessee
    Posts
    1,295
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpyderFun View Post
    Are you doing a belt alignment or belt tension?

    Jacking under the rear shock is a no-no per the maintenance manual.

    Not too sure why you would go as high as 3rd gear when 1st gear can give you the rotation necessary for determining proper alignment.
    Doing alignment: I think I read somewhere that using 3rd was a little safer if something were to happen and the spyder fell to the ground. It would kill the motor easier than first. I am sure it doesn't matter much either way. Also it seemed to spin a little smoother in 3rd than 1st, i had it in both. 1st was a little more hurky jerky. Anyway the alignment worked out perfect and all is well. I ordered a Kriket to check the belt tension and will tackle that next. Thanks for your input.
    Happy Spyderlovers

  21. #21
    Very Active Member Oldmanzues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beavercreek, Ohio
    Posts
    1,809
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Thank you very much. Abig help, as allways
    Oldmanzues
    Very Happy Spyder Owner

  22. #22
    Registered Users pellcitypete's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    pell city alabama
    Posts
    270
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default I tried alignment w/tire off ground

    Quote Originally Posted by StanProff View Post
    Is there anything wrong with placing the floor jack under the shock/mount and get the tire just an inch off the concrete? Seems this would keep the tension on the belt same as on the ground.

    Also I have played with it in the last few days on alignment and have run in 3rd gear with it jacked up and have not had a Limp mode. (I seen mention of this somewhere, that if the rear wheel is moving and the front is not that you will get a limp mode). Mine is a 2010 Rt-S. If it is pointed in a straight line I don't think the computer cares, kinda like doing a burn out etc. I wouldn't abuse mine that way but I've seen it done.
    I had my spyder (2011 rt ) orr the ground like you and all broke out computer went crazy! you are lucky or I am jinks just my 2 cents Pete
    my wife and I on our 2011 spyder-rt-L'IL Red

  23. #23
    SpyderLovers Founder Lamonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    15,858
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pellcitypete View Post
    I had my spyder (2011 rt ) orr the ground like you and all broke out computer went crazy! you are lucky or I am jinks just my 2 cents Pete
    He got lucky and yours did what it should do. You should not run your Spyder in gear without pulling the speed sensor and I wouldn't recommend doing that. You can do all your adjustment just fine like I have posted above.

  24. #24
    Registered Users
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default Axle Nut

    Thanks for all the info on adjusting the belt. Can anyone tell me how tight the axle nut should be? Thanks!!

  25. #25
    Motorbike Professor NancysToy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Allegan, MI
    Posts
    20,514
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill C View Post
    Thanks for all the info on adjusting the belt. Can anyone tell me how tight the axle nut should be? Thanks!!
    96 lbf-ft
    -Scotty
    2011 Spyder RTS-SM5 (mine)
    2000 BMW R1100RTP, motorized tricycle & 23 vintage bikes
    2011 RT-622 trailer, Aspen Sentry popup camper, custom motorcycle trailer to pull behind the Spyder



    Mutant Trikes Forever!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •