Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default What's the recommended Belt Tension?

    I have noticed that there's mention in a couple of threads about the drive belt tension being to high and some people found that lowering it gave better results.

    When searching belt tension, belt alignment and drive belts they all list a whole lot of threads but mostly none covered this exactly or either I couldn't find it.

    So what's the recommended tension? I see 190 mentioned a lot as standard but what works best? I'm trying to get rid of some belt whine/noise on my 2020 RT-L

    Thanks
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  2. #2
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    N. Wilkesboro, NC
    Posts
    1,902
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    It should be in your owners manual. Both of my RTs (2018 and current 2021) have had a high speed vibration, both around 70+mph. I had the belt tension lowered on both. It didn't do anything on the 2018 so I added a harmonic vibration dampening device (aka belt tensioner). It solved the problem. When I lowered the tension on the 2021, all it did was move the vibration to a different speed. I added a belt tensioner to this one, too, which again solved the problem.

    Others haven't had any vibration and others have been able to completely eliminate the vibration simply by lowering the belt tension.

  3. #3
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    I did install the lamonster belt tensioner today and it made little to no difference that I could tell. That's why I thought I would lower the belt tension.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  4. #4
    SpyderLovers Sponsor BajaRon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Greeneville, TN
    Posts
    13,515
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K80Shooter View Post
    I did install the lamonster belt tensioner today and it made little to no difference that I could tell. That's why I thought I would lower the belt tension.
    What is you current belt tension? Hard to say where you should go until you know where you are.
    Shop Ph: 423-609-7588 (M-F, 8-5, Eastern Time)

    Only SLOW people have to leave on time...





  5. #5
    Active Member ButterSmooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    470
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    I feel like I'm setting myself up like a B-17 over Schweinfurt on Black Thursday, but I don't get good results with a KriKit. In all likely hood it's my technique, but the Krikit seems to be insensitive to change, and the readout is rather coarse.

    I use a Snark musical instrument tuner to measure the belt (pluck) frequency. I validated the Snark accuracy with more sophisticated instruments and used the Gates formula for my belt. I tried my cell phone with the Gates and other apps, but the cell phone microphone can't sense the low frequencies required. These are the tensions I ended up with:

    122# in the air at the loose spot
    173# in the air at the tight spot
    150# on the ground at the loose spot
    193# on the ground at the tight spot
    for an average tension of ~160#

    With this setting there is a slight vibration at 70mph, and it was better at 180# average. (next time)

    Also, measuring the tension at three wheel positions is critical, since there is considerable run-out in the rear sprocket.
    Head in the game, eyes down the road... 2020RT
    Spyder Tryke Pylot
    2020 RT , Lamonster extender Petrol

  6. #6
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BajaRon View Post
    What is you current belt tension? Hard to say where you should go until you know where you are.
    Using this (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1) it is at 190, thought I might back it off to 180 and try that.

    I took this reading after the dealer checked the tension per my request.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  7. #7
    Very Active Member BLUEKNIGHT911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central VERMONT
    Posts
    20,268
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButterSmooth View Post
    I feel like I'm setting myself up like a B-17 over Schweinfurt on Black Thursday, but I don't get good results with a KriKit. In all likely hood it's my technique, but the Krikit seems to be insensitive to change, and the readout is rather coarse.

    I use a Snark musical instrument tuner to measure the belt (pluck) frequency. I validated the Snark accuracy with more sophisticated instruments and used the Gates formula for my belt. I tried my cell phone with the Gates and other apps, but the cell phone microphone can't sense the low frequencies required. These are the tensions I ended up with:

    122# in the air at the loose spot
    173# in the air at the tight spot
    150# on the ground at the loose spot
    193# on the ground at the tight spot
    for an average tension of ~160#

    With this setting there is a slight vibration at 70mph, and it was better at 180# average. (next time)

    Also, measuring the tension at three wheel positions is critical, since there is considerable run-out in the rear sprocket.
    Using a KritKit or any other tool that can be used - you shouldn't be using a loose or tight spot .... the KritKit has to beused in the manner that tool is designed for ie. the middle of the belt any other spot is going to give a False reading .... I only check it with the wheel ON_THE_GROUND.... I use 160lbs. measured in the middle of the belt...... I have no vibes that I can feel ..... good luck .... Mike

  8. #8
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUEKNIGHT911 View Post
    Using a KritKit or any other tool that can be used - you shouldn't be using a loose or tight spot .... the KritKit has to beused in the manner that tool is designed for ie. the middle of the belt any other spot is going to give a False reading .... I only check it with the wheel ON_THE_GROUND.... I use 160lbs. measured in the middle of the belt...... I have no vibes that I can feel ..... good luck .... Mike
    I did check it with the wheel on the ground and also in the center of the belt, honestly I checked it in several places before I settled on the 190 reading from the middle of the belt. I have the side plastic off right now so now's the time I want to try this. I'll try the 160lbs 1st.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  9. #9
    Active Member Doug44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Decatur, IL
    Posts
    72
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    I added LaM idler kit and it so far has completely taken care of the issue. However I am under the impression that this is sort of a can of worms for some or most that never goes away. Seems to go along with owning a Spyder
    Doug 2020 RTL F3 Short reach bars -factory backrest
    K9CRT Ham Radio
    Sold 5/27/2021 Spyder just wasn’t for me. Went back to Goldwing

  10. #10
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    I think that I must have one that wont go away. I added the lamonster idler/tensioner....No help.

    I lowered the tension of the belt.... No help.

    I increased the tension of the belt.... No help

    I have it at 160 now with the lamonster tensioner installed. (Measured it on the ground without the tensioner touching the belt) I'm going to button it back up and just ride it until someone say's the new (white) pulley helps or doesn't help. I'm also going to continue complaining to the dealer. They did tell me it would be replaced so we'll see but I doubt it.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  11. #11
    Very Active Member EdMat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Clinton, MS
    Posts
    1,541
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K80Shooter View Post
    I think that I must have one that wont go away. I added the lamonster idler/tensioner....No help.

    I lowered the tension of the belt.... No help.

    I increased the tension of the belt.... No help

    I have it at 160 now with the lamonster tensioner installed. (Measured it on the ground without the tensioner touching the belt) I'm going to button it back up and just ride it until someone say's the new (white) pulley helps or doesn't help. I'm also going to continue complaining to the dealer. They did tell me it would be replaced so we'll see but I doubt it.
    Are you sure its not a tire problem you are feeling?
    2019 RT Limited , Phoenix Orange

  12. #12
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EdMat View Post
    Are you sure its not a tire problem you are feeling?
    It's not what I feel, it's what I hear. There's several threads about it on here.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  13. #13
    Active Member ButterSmooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    470
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by K80Shooter View Post
    It's not what I feel, it's what I hear. There's several threads about it on here.
    Is it the 49 ± 2mph whine? If so, that is the main thing the 'new' pulley fixes. My whine was quite bad, but it went almost completely away when I aligned my belt 3.5mm from the inner rear flange. That's right in the middle of the 2-5mm specified range. The other sound mine made was a 'Gronk' when taking off from a stop -- even worse if turning from a stop. The alignment fixed that completely. My belt has always been against the outer-front pulley flange -- no adjustment ever changed that.

    I'll probably change to the new pulley in the near future. If I need to take it off for maintenance, there's no point in putting the 'old' one back on.
    Head in the game, eyes down the road... 2020RT
    Spyder Tryke Pylot
    2020 RT , Lamonster extender Petrol

  14. #14
    Very Active Member K80Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Hartwell, Ga
    Posts
    1,416
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButterSmooth View Post
    Is it the 49 ± 2mph whine? If so, that is the main thing the 'new' pulley fixes. My whine was quite bad, but it went almost completely away when I aligned my belt 3.5mm from the inner rear flange. That's right in the middle of the 2-5mm specified range. The other sound mine made was a 'Gronk' when taking off from a stop -- even worse if turning from a stop. The alignment fixed that completely. My belt has always been against the outer-front pulley flange -- no adjustment ever changed that.

    I'll probably change to the new pulley in the near future. If I need to take it off for maintenance, there's no point in putting the 'old' one back on.
    That's it from about 46 to 52 or so it's pretty loud but any other speed it's livable, honestly I can live with it if I had to. I have moved the belt in and out but that doesn't help either. When I got it the belt was on the inside flange of both pully's, I moved it over but it went against the outside front pully then. I've moved it back a little and the belt is maybe a 1/8" from the inside of the rear pully and I can get a business card between the outer flange of the front pully. In my opinion the front pully should have been a little wider.
    2020 RT Limited Chrome , Petrol Blue

  15. #15
    Very Active Member Bangorbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Pahrump NV
    Posts
    562
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Most people make it sound very easy to set the belt tension. I guess I am missing something. Please correct me, but you have to lossen the axle nuts-correct? Aren't they torqued at over 200 ft lbs?

  16. #16
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Platte City, MO
    Posts
    595
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    166 lb.ft. I believe. Not too big of a deal, but you do need a long breaker bar to loosen, and a 200+ lb.ft. torque wrench to retighten them.
    Peggy and Howard

    Hers: 2013 Spyder ST-S SM5

    His: 1999 Honda VFR Interceptor

  17. #17
    Active Member ButterSmooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    470
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bangorbob View Post
    Most people make it sound very easy to set the belt tension. I guess I am missing something. Please correct me, but you have to lossen the axle nuts-correct? Aren't they torqued at over 200 ft lbs?
    166'#. I don't know how easy it is for other folks, but it's a fiddly adjustment for me. The single biggest problem for me is that the belt moves toward the inner rear flange when the axle torque is increased from 90'# to 166'#. The adjusters are under tension and never loosen and everything is locked in position at 90'#. But when the final torque is applied the belt moves inboard about 1/4". The last time I did it, at 90'# it ran at the outer edge of the sprocket, then moved in when torqued to mid-spec, 3.5mm. Repeated tightening to 166'# can be exhausting for an old man.

    I also noted in the parts diagram that the axle nut is a one use item. You'd need a pile of them if it had to be replaced for each tightening.
    Head in the game, eyes down the road... 2020RT
    Spyder Tryke Pylot
    2020 RT , Lamonster extender Petrol

  18. #18
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Platte City, MO
    Posts
    595
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Somehow I doubt that everyone replaces them every time.
    Peggy and Howard

    Hers: 2013 Spyder ST-S SM5

    His: 1999 Honda VFR Interceptor

  19. #19
    Very Active Member Jetfixer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Lake Wylie, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    1,040
    Spyder Garage
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButterSmooth View Post
    166'#. I don't know how easy it is for other folks, but it's a fiddly adjustment for me. The single biggest problem for me is that the belt moves toward the inner rear flange when the axle torque is increased from 90'# to 166'#. The adjusters are under tension and never loosen and everything is locked in position at 90'#. But when the final torque is applied the belt moves inboard about 1/4". The last time I did it, at 90'# it ran at the outer edge of the sprocket, then moved in when torqued to mid-spec, 3.5mm. Repeated tightening to 166'# can be exhausting for an old man.

    I also noted in the parts diagram that the axle nut is a one use item. You'd need a pile of them if it had to be replaced for each tightening.
    It can be a very tedious process, but after adjusting the tension, try lowering the bike to the floor before you tighten the axle nut to final torque. This will generally prevent the shift you are getting by allowing the geometry of the swingarm and the weight of the bike to keep both tensioners loaded. If you apply final torque with the wheel in the air, you are putting in enough twist to move one side slightly off the tensioner which is why you then see the belt move. If you got the tension set right, you're done. If you still need to adjust it, then it's back up & down on the jack some more!
    2020 RT Limited , Marsala Red

  20. #20
    Very Active Member BLUEKNIGHT911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central VERMONT
    Posts
    20,268
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ButterSmooth View Post
    166'#. I don't know how easy it is for other folks, but it's a fiddly adjustment for me. The single biggest problem for me is that the belt moves toward the inner rear flange when the axle torque is increased from 90'# to 166'#. The adjusters are under tension and never loosen and everything is locked in position at 90'#. But when the final torque is applied the belt moves inboard about 1/4". The last time I did it, at 90'# it ran at the outer edge of the sprocket, then moved in when torqued to mid-spec, 3.5mm. Repeated tightening to 166'# can be exhausting for an old man.

    I also noted in the parts diagram that the axle nut is a one use item. You'd need a pile of them if it had to be replaced for each tightening.
    Those " so-called " ONE USE nuts are called that because of ..... LAWYERS .... I have been re-using, " one-use " nuts for Decades and never had a problem. Have you noticed in your Owners manual, that BRP says you should bring your Spyder IMMEDIATELY to your nearest Dealer if you have any problems ...... do you ????? ................... good luck ... Mike

  21. #21
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Northern Kalifornia
    Posts
    3,398
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetfixer View Post
    It can be a very tedious process, but after adjusting the tension, try lowering the bike to the floor before you tighten the axle nut to final torque. This will generally prevent the shift you are getting by allowing the geometry of the swingarm and the weight of the bike to keep both tensioners loaded. If you apply final torque with the wheel in the air, you are putting in enough twist to move one side slightly off the tensioner which is why you then see the belt move. If you got the tension set right, you're done. If you still need to adjust it, then it's back up & down on the jack some more!
    Good advice. And it helps if when do the final torque, torque each side against their adjusters. IE; one wrench up and one wrench down in the proper direction. I think 90#'s is plenty of torque for the final adjustment. Ask Joe on Squared Away, he's done a freight car load of belt adjustments.

  22. #22
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Platte City, MO
    Posts
    595
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    The axle bolt/nut is supposed to be torqued to 160 lb.ft.
    Peggy and Howard

    Hers: 2013 Spyder ST-S SM5

    His: 1999 Honda VFR Interceptor

  23. #23
    Very Active Member IdahoMtnSpyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    9,767
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    In 2015 BRP issued a tech bulletin, TST61Y014S05, that deals with belt tension and vibration. See also this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_k8bHF0PJo. Essentially what it says is set the belt tension somewhere between min and max that results in the least amount of vibration at a speed the owner can live with.

    As far as the ordeal of getting the axle to not move while torquing read about my travails and offered suggestions here: https://www.spyderlovers.com/forums/...nsion+tracking.

    To get the torque necessary don't spend money on a 3/4" torque wrench. Get a torque multiplier wrench and use your 1/2" drive torque wrench. This is what I have and used, or one like it. https://www.amazon.com/Wheel-Torque-...5155005&sr=8-5

    2014 Copper RTS

    Tri-Axis bars, CB, BajaRon sway bar & shock adjusters, SpyderPop's Bumpskid, NBV peg brackets, LED headlights and modulator, Wolo trumpet air horns, trailer hitch, custom trailer harness, high mount turn signals, Custom Dynamics brake light, LED turn signal lights on mirrors, LED strip light for a dash light, garage door opener, LED lights in frunk, trunk, and saddlebags, RAM mounts and cradles for tablet (for GPS) and phone (for music), and Smooth Spyder belt tensioner.
    2014 RTS , Copper! (officially Cognac)

  24. #24
    Very Active Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Northern Kalifornia
    Posts
    3,398
    Spyder Garage
    0

    Default

    From 2011 to 2013 the torque value for the rear axel was 96/98 lbs. 2014 came along and it changed to 166 lbs and no one seems to know why. Different material in the axel? Misprint in owner's manual? A 70 lb change in one year is a bunch for no reason given, and there's been no change in the axel and the nuts. According to Cheap Cycle Parts, the rear axle part number for the 2013 spyder is (705501691) and is the same for the 2014, (705501691). Both jam nuts are the same also (250100103). The 2021 f3 Rear Wheel Axle part number is also the same (705501691) however the jam nut number has changed to (250100170). That part number changed in 2015, but it is still an M24 nut as described in all the parts list from 2011 to 2021.

  25. #25
    Active Member ButterSmooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    470
    Spyder Garage
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2dogs View Post
    From 2011 to 2013 the torque value for the rear axel was 96/98 lbs. 2014 came along and it changed to 166 lbs and no one seems to know why. Different material in the axel? Misprint in owner's manual? A 70 lb change in one year is a bunch for no reason given, and there's been no change in the axel and the nuts. According to Cheap Cycle Parts, the rear axle part number for the 2013 spyder is (705501691) and is the same for the 2014, (705501691). Both jam nuts are the same also (250100103). The 2021 f3 Rear Wheel Axle part number is also the same (705501691) however the jam nut number has changed to (250100170). That part number changed in 2015, but it is still an M24 nut as described in all the parts list from 2011 to 2021.
    I'm not sure when it happened, but the only change I've noticed is the elimination of the split-pin lock.
    Head in the game, eyes down the road... 2020RT
    Spyder Tryke Pylot
    2020 RT , Lamonster extender Petrol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •