Sorry but they all now have the 79 tooth rear drives, to check this is correct all you have to do is go to this web site.
http://epc.brp.com/Index.aspx?lang=E...7-eca65551efdc
Printable View
Sorry but they all now have the 79 tooth rear drives, to check this is correct all you have to do is go to this web site.
http://epc.brp.com/Index.aspx?lang=E...7-eca65551efdc
Hi Chupaca, is the belt for the 89 tooth sprocket N ° 705502157?
That link is not valid. Trying to see what you are speaking of.
I know the F3S still has the larger sprocket and all the F3T I have seen have it. But there are no specific mention of it or photos on the 2019 BRP site that I can find.
If they removed the larger sprocket from the F3T for 19, its a big step down. Leaves only the F3S as the hot dog. The sprocket makes a significant difference.
Makes you wonder if BRP is removing performance from the F3 line so as to bring a higher performance option out next year....
Still, its a shame that the current models are slower than the previous. Makes the desire to upgrade all that much less.
The change of the pinion is perhaps the best way to give more acceleration to our vehicle, it is a pity that BRP supplies that 89 teeth only for the northern market AMERICA, I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE REASON.
However I am more and more convinced to do it, there will be around $ 1000, but I believe that the expense is worth it ........ the reports
of the gearbox for now they are too long, when I put the sixth gear the bike has no strength and just a small climb and the bike begins to lower its speed!
This has been tried on an RT and it didn't work because of the computer. Good luck.
By now we have established that BRP has in its spare parts catalog a pinion 89 teeth, so it is no longer necessary to look for those who produce them, the problem is whether it is possible to mount it or not and hear it limping.
But then even if I mount a tire of a different height than the original (for example 225- 45/15) will the control unit become limping?
If you don't sort out the electronics programming (ECM, TCM, dash etc) it's not going to work. There have been attempts to "convert" to an 89t from a 79t but have failed due to the inability to "reprogram" the existing computer(s)/dash. You most likely will end up having to replace all the affected electronics with items from an 89t machine and then do the required programming.... Gonna be pricey if this is the only way. I still feel that there must be a way to reprogram the existing hardware but that BRP has that locked down to their access only and/or it is so convoluted no one else can get it sorted out.
But has anyone tried to understand why the control unit gives the error? perhaps because it reads a different speed than
at the engine revs for which it was programmed?
Yes, that is precisely why it does not work.
When I had the bike and I changed the pinion, I had mounted an electronic device that was used to bring back on the instrumentation the correct speed since the change of the pinion had altered it. Do you think it could be useful in our case?