Oh one other thing. I need a cab on the rss.
I know j&m makes a handlebar mount.
I still want an rss. I want a 2013 green one......If I can even find one.
Maybe a little work , basic install on most of that stuff
I've saw a st style windshield adapted to a RS didn't look to complicated. Heated grips may pose a little challenge to some.
The extra cost of the RT compared to the RS may be the contributing factor, if you figure about $1000 for the BRP side bag kit , $100 for a heTed grip kit (non BRP) , couple hundred dollars for a windshield, not sure what the highway pegs cost and switching to the ST bars on the RS and the ergo are changed
Heated grips super easy $40 aftermarket kit put switch through the vent holes beside the speedo no drilling some soft saddle bags over the seat you can take them off when not needed no ugly brackets and way easier to throw your leg over in every day riding,the rs is simpler lighter less to go wrong and for the cost of a loaded rt we both have our own rides so no worries about rear sedat comfort
thank you for sharing with us the "reverse trade" as it goes to show all of us rss/rs riders aren't totally crazy. it also supports our rides as not being the entry level roadster, but the roadsters for all of those wanting to be a little "sportier!!!!" now how do you like that mr. "d"?
Just my $0.02 here. My wife Becky has the RT-S. I have the RS-S. I would not say that the RS-S is a downgrade, but in some ways it is. Creature-comfort-wise, the RS-S is a downgrade: No radio speakers, no rear hatch (unless you buy aftermarket, Corbin has some nice options) no 12V outlet or trunk liner (accessories available though), small windscreen is surprisingly good but much more of a sport-bike wind-feel, sub-par mirrors, no highway runners, just footpegs, no parking-brake button (must use e-brake behind left foot "clank"), seat positions you upward and down into the handlebars at an angle like a sport-bike.
Now, on the plus side for the RS-S, 200 pounds less means better gas mileage and obviously significantly faster and quicker to turn. 0-60 is 4.4 sec. versus the RT which is 6.8, so.. Corvette vs. Honda Civic in acceleration. 0.72g vs. 0.56g on the skidpad, so that's more Honda Civic versus Prius there, though I find the RS-S doesn't mind a little front-end slippage dug-in, with some bravery you could up that 0.72 to a 0.80g pretty easily. Gas mileage for her RT-S is about 40mpg right now. Mine is around 55mpg so far: wind resistance is a big factor here and it can obviously be improved by lowering that front tower of a windscreen-sail, though that sail eliminates almost all wind for a VERY comfortable, relaxed ride at highway-speeds.
The RT-S has that super-cozy back-seat. It's important to remind the passenger not to fall asleep back there, it's that cozy. Seriously. For kicks, I let her put me there on the back and I was just in plush-heaven. I doubt she'd feel the same on the back of my RS-S. It's a bit more.. frantic I'd suspect. Really considering those Corbins.
The RS-S is a more passionate sporty vehicle with an edge, the RT and ST models are more for relaxed cruising and comfort. Older Cadillac vs. Corvette. Your choice. Do what we did and choose both. Two different animals, the strengths for one is the weakness of the other and vise-versa. Both quite nice. Just make sure you get that "S" version.
If I wanted to ride a couch I would stay home. RS-S allows me to play a lot harder.
Just sayin'............
Three in the garage, and I think I can fit at least one more in.....and then we will have to build another garage.
The roads in NY are so bad that I am glad we bought a Ryker Rally
If I wanted to ride a couch I would stay home. RS-S allows me to play a lot harder.
Just sayin'............
I'm right there with you otter. Personally, If BRP only made the RT I wouldn't own one.
Its fine if your into that kind of thing, but I'm not into riding an RV.
Someone mentioned an ST. I have never really looked at one.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
OK I have rode the RT ST and RS I like the RS the best. We had the RT first. Johnnyg made a mistake in getting me to try the RT, I did and got hooked I always rode as a co-rider. But of course I had to have my own so I bought the 2011 RS made all the extra changes 4" risers cruise, corbin seat, heated glove hook up. and now I added the HP Fairing with audio 4 speaker. I love how it handles and the sport ride over the RT. Since I won't ride as a Co-rider any more John traded his RT on the ST He loves it. He wanted the sportier ride also. I have rode the ST also he keeps telling me I would like it better. But I don't. This is something that is a personal thing, you will have to find someone that will let you ride theirs so you can make up your own mind. Good luck I know you will love what ever you decide.
RT to an ST, yes (may do that one day)...
But RT to RS... interesting.
IMHO, I do not like riding my wife's RS... I can do short rides in it, but after a few minutes, my back is starting to ache. And she has the 1" riser on her handlebars.
Erick, Face it your just getting to old. You need to start exercising with Leira
corbin Lamont cut seat with back rest, graphic gator,Chrome grips, trailer hitch,buttler mug, two brothers exhaust, painted center fender strips. center brake light, Led lights, tricLed fender lights
[QUOTE=gene0108;807176]I don't think I will miss any of the features. It is the riding position that I am worried about. I have almost 40k on my RT. I want a sportier ride. So I guess I ride 10k per year.
I am not really excited about the looks of the rt.
Great information. Just trying to decide.
I guess I have to find a friend who has one and go ride it 500 miles in one day.
Se from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
I traded my 2010 RT in on an ST. I wanted a sportier ryde but knew my knees and hips couldn't handle the RS. The ST sits you up straighter like the RT, is 250# lighter than the RT, and handles curves much better than my RT. And I didn't have to give up the heated hand grips or radio with the ST limited. even have a GPS.
It's fast and sweeet. I just got back from a 4,500 mile trip out west. It was quite comfy. Hope this helps
For what its worth... Sold a 2011 RS for a brand new 2012 RT-S in 2013. In a lot of ways, really wish I hadn't. Loved the riding position of the RS and the power. Yes the RT is very comfortable in a Lazy-Boy kind of way. The riding position seems very well suited to my 91 year old dad. Way down on power with all the extra pounds. If I could do it all over again, I would have added a better seat to the RS, an audio system and a better cruise control then the Throttle Meister I had installed.
The RT makes me feel like an old fart when I ride it. (yes, realize I am anyways) To compare using two wheels....The best example is the RS is like a Yamaha FJR or maybe a Kawi Connie. The RT feels like the Goldwing. The RT is not bad and has its great points, just my opinion is that the RS is a whole lot more fun to ride. Was just talking to my wife and she wants me to mention how much more comfortable she is on the RT then the RS we had. She said the difference in the seat is night and day. We had the BRP backrest on our RS and BRP side cases.
i had the rs 2010 befor i went to the rt the rs killed my knees,and back after 30 mins,so i had to go to the rt and the wife loves the rt back seat so if your knees are good bent like they need to be riding a rss grab it.
Someone has to defend the RS. I have a 2011 RSS. I do not find it uncomfortable to ride. Ride all day with stops every hour or so. It has 3" risers and the BRP touring windshield.
I am not an aggressive rider so I get 30+ MPG.
I may switch to an RT in the future so my wife is more comfortable.
Where did you get your 3" risers? and did you install them yourself?
Posture is very important on the RS line of Spyders... if I slouch, I notice within a mile or two that I start getting lower back discomfort. Cruise control would be nice (mine's a 2012, so I need to add an aftermarket system here at some point).