-
Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie
[QUOTE=Little Blue;1566242]
Originally Posted by IdahoMtnSpyder
Thank You for the heads up.
Originally Posted by Little Blue
Not sure what happened in the last post.
(the quote & the text line that's shown immediately above your last post as quoted )
You (or the software) put in TWO [.QUOTE] 'initiators', but as IMS mentioned, somehow you've ended up with only ONE [./QUOTE] 'terminator' on the end - so the software ignored the first initiator cos there's no terminator; but the second initiator was followed by text & then a terminator, and cos it had a 'start' and a 'finish' it worked the way it's meant to.
If you'd had the terminator for the first one tagged on the end like this:
[.QUOTE=Little Blue;1566242][.QUOTE=IdahoMtnSpyder;1566233]
Thank You for the heads up.[/.QUOTE] [/.QUOTE] it would've appeared like this:
Originally Posted by Little Blue
Originally Posted by IdahoMtnSpyder
Thank You for the heads up.
BUT, if you open a quote & close it before starting the next, so that each is completed with its own initiator & terminator, it will appear like this:
Originally Posted by Little Blue
(edited to add text to highlight the example)
Originally Posted by IdahoMtnSpyder
Thank You for the heads up.
and the Quote with text & Command Delimiters would look like this:
[.QUOTE=Little Blue;1566242] (edited to add text to highlight the example) [/.QUOTE] [.QUOTE=IdahoMtnSpyder;1566233]
Thank You for the heads up.[/.QUOTE]
See how each initiator is followed by a terminator?? Each "quote" needs to be contained within it's full & complete Command Delimiters, either sequentially to show one quote followed by the next; or 'nested' within a complete set to show one quote embedded inside the other. Make sense?
Last edited by Peter Aawen; 03-15-2021 at 04:56 PM.
2013 RT Ltd Pearl White
Ryde More, Worry Less!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|