-
-
Very Active Member
200 mph
Originally Posted by Highwayman2013
Want to go that 200mph on the speedo?
no that is a lil too fast but at least 150
NO BIKE AT THIS TIME
-
-
Very Active Member
200 mph
all my other bikes have been cruisers and i have never had a high rev bike b4 so i am used to shifting by ear and when i hear that engine hitting high rpm's i think i need to shift. i am sure i will get used to it and i watch the speedo now for shifting into 5 th gear, so that is my reason i say i would like a 6 th gear just a old dog trying to learn a new riding way
NO BIKE AT THIS TIME
-
SpyderLovers Founder
Originally Posted by cuznjohn
all my other bikes have been cruisers and i have never had a high rev bike b4 so i am used to shifting by ear and when i hear that engine hitting high rpm's i think i need to shift. i am sure i will get used to it and i watch the speedo now for shifting into 5 th gear, so that is my reason i say i would like a 6 th gear just a old dog trying to learn a new riding way
The current Rotax motor had a 6th gear but that was replaced by the reverse gear. If there was room in this motor for another gear I'm sure it would be there.
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by Bob Denman
Randy,
The "sweet spot" is that rpm rnage where the bike is making it's most useable power... YOu can't move the sweet spot down the rpm scale by adding another gear any more than I can be made smarter by parking over next to the Town's Library... (SORRY!)
In it's current engine configuration and state of tune; a sixth gear would be a waste of space and dollars... nothing more.
Thanks Bob. You de-tuned Randy much better than I did.
Penny and Rick have owned many motorcycles starting in 1974 with Hondas, then to Suzukis, Gold Wings and ultimately Spyders.
74 Honda 360T (pair); 78 Suzuki GS 1000 (pair); 82 Honda Aspencade; 84 Honda 400; 87 Yamaha 1100; 99 Honda Valkyrie; 01 Suzuki Burgman(triked); 02 Honda GL 1800(triked); 10 Spyder RTSE; 11 Spyder RTSM; 12 Spyder RTSL (pair); 20 Spyder RTL (current)
-
This is how I understand it.
Originally Posted by Bob Denman
Randy,
The "sweet spot" is that rpm rnage where the bike is making it's most useable power... YOu can't move the sweet spot down the rpm scale by adding another gear any more than I can be made smarter by parking over next to the Town's Library... (SORRY!)
In it's current engine configuration and state of tune; a sixth gear would be a waste of space and dollars... nothing more.
I might be wrong but the difference would be that the gears would be shorter. It's like carrying a long piece of wood. You can cut the wood up into 5 or 6 pieces. Either way you are still carrying the same amount of wood, it's just how much work it takes to carry it. A 6 speed is more work for the driver (for obvious reasons) but less work for the engine to get you up to speed by spinning at a lower RPM. Therfore, it would save you fuel.
I'm no expert, but this is how I understand it. So if I'm wrong I apoligize.
-
-
Registered Users
Originally Posted by willey
We have a 2013RTS we now have 8200 trouble free miles on it.I was in 5th gear last night for the first time in a long time.We were on the free way running 75 mph.I never shift into 5th under 70mph.Why do I need a 6th gear?I love this bike,Its like driving a sports car.I often wonder if the folks that are knocking the 2013s own one or are just repeating what they read here.I can find nothing wrong with my 2013.Its a great bike.
-
SpyderLovers Founder
Originally Posted by arntufun
I might be wrong but the difference would be that the gears would be shorter. It's like carrying a long piece of wood. You can cut the wood up into 5 or 6 pieces. Either way you are still carrying the same amount of wood, it's just how much work it takes to carry it. A 6 speed is more work for the driver (for obvious reasons) but less work for the engine to get you up to speed by spinning at a lower RPM. Therfore, it would save you fuel.
I'm no expert, but this is how I understand it. So if I'm wrong I apoligize.
A 6 speed is more efficient in operation, it lets you choose and use the most efficient gear for the power ban of an engine when need.
-
Do you think that it offers enough of a benefit for the Spyders to make it worth the cost and effort of a redesign?
-
Last edited by arntufun; 08-16-2013 at 09:55 AM.
-
-
Very Active Member
heat
i can't stand heat and my BMW K 1600 in traffic was really bad but i don't find a heat problem on my 13 rt. i worry about my feet and legs being diabetic but i have no complaints with the heat and my bike
NO BIKE AT THIS TIME
-
You too?
(48 plus years as a Type I)
-
Very Active Member
-
Very Active Member
I wonder if they will do away with the SE5 sometime and just go to a drivetrain similar to a snowmobile or the Nissan Altima's 'Pure Drive' system. No gears to change. That I believe would be beneficial to a lot of people, maybe not to others who are used to the gear change but like anything you would get used to it.
-
Registered Users
What they are saying is each gear would be a little shorter than it is now and you would add a 6th. So instead of shifting out of 1st at 25 to 30 mph you would shift at 18 to 23mph. Each gear would end sooner thus allowing you to shift into 6th at 65mph or so. With the present 5 speed there is a space between 3rd and 4th where I feel like I'm turning to many rpms to cruse in 3rd but when I shift to 4th I feel the motor is almost lugging. The 6 speed would allow these gears to be closer and could allow you to comfortably cruse in 4th gear without feeling the lugging or over reving in 3rd.
2013 RSS
Grip Puppies, Calsci Tinted Shorty windshield, Garage remote mod
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by spydaman60
ya but unless you were doing about 80 mph you'd never get into 6th gear---would you?
I believe what lamonster is saying is that the gearing would just be shorter in duration but the same in the end.
-
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by bscrive
I wonder if they will do away with the SE5 sometime and just go to a drivetrain similar to a snowmobile or the Nissan Altima's 'Pure Drive' system. No gears to change. That I believe would be beneficial to a lot of people, maybe not to others who are used to the gear change but like anything you would get used to it.
I want a CVT transmission, brakes on the handlebars, direct inject fuel injection, more horsepower and train horns
2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS convertible. 2017 GMC Sierra cc diesel. 2017 Arctic cat RR 137 ES
-
This discussion quickly went south, can we bring it back on track for joes like me deciding between a 13 or 14???
-
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by thedonva
This discussion quickly went south, can we bring it back on track for joes like me deciding between a 13 or 14???
This close to introduction time, I would recommend holding off until you see what 2014 has to offer. If the 2014's are not what you want, there should be some good deals on 2013's, 2012's etc. I purchased a brand new 2011 RT A&C in July of 2012, saved a couple thousand, got a good trade in, and am very happy with the even though it was two years old (model year) when I purchased it.
Lots of choice if you are not in a big hurry. Good luck on your hunt.
Currently Owned: 2019 F3 Limited, 2020 F3 Limited: SOLD BOTH LIMITEDS in October of 2023.
Previously : 2008 GS-SM5 (silver), 2009 RS-SE5 (red), 2010 RT-S Premier Editon #474 (black) 2011 RT A&C SE5 (magnesium) 2014 RTS-SE6 (yellow)
MY FINAL TALLY: 7 Spyders, 15 years, 205,500 miles
IT HAS BEEN A LONG, WONDERFUL, AND FUN RIDE.
-
If this helps at all..
Supposedly, these photos were taken during a "commercial shoot".
They purport to show a 2014 RT...
2014 01.jpg2014 02.jpg2014 03.jpg
That's all that we've seen; is it for real??
http://www.advrider.com/forums/showt...r#post21684106
Last edited by Bob Denman; 08-16-2013 at 05:09 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|