-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by BajaRon
Actually the Kenda tire is 'different' than the others but not because of the 2 ply sidewall. All the tires that we are discussing are 2 ply sidewall. The difference is in the tread area where the Kenda is 2 ply and the others are all 4 ply. 4 ply in the tread keeps the tread area flatter at speed giving you more contact area.
Centrifugal force at speed tends to cause a tire to bulge in the middle of the tread. More plies in the tread area tend to resist this force keeping the entire tread area in contact with the ground. If your Kenda tire wears faster in the middle it could be over inflation, or it could be a lot of high speed riding.
My tires seem to wear evenly...BUT if the other tires are the same specification as the Kendas as for size and sidewall & footprint, then there should be no problem switching over. That is what is great about this forum, we can all be educated by others experience.
-
Originally Posted by Star Cruiser
My tires seem to wear evenly...BUT if the other tires are the same specification as the Kendas as for size and sidewall & footprint, then there should be no problem switching over. That is what is great about this forum, we can all be educated by others experience.
You should also consider wet and dry traction, and speed rating.
-
Very Active Member
KENDA TIRES
Originally Posted by Jerbear
Mike, how do the car tires you're running compare (speaking of rating here) to the Kenda's?
The company that makes the Kenda tire doesn't seem to want to give out to many relevant performance facts about their product, other than we made it...BRP says you must buy it....that's all ......I would have to dig around to find the exact info on my tires....in essence their speed rating is above 120 mph , very good traction dry and wet, and should last 45,000 miles + on a car that weighs 3500 lbs.....if you want the exact specs ....go to discount tires direct.com and look at the Kumho Ecsta and the Falken Ziex 512......and I am very Happy with all of them .....Mike....
Last edited by BLUEKNIGHT911; 07-15-2012 at 09:19 AM.
-
SpyderLovers Sponsor
Originally Posted by NancysToy
You should also consider wet and dry traction, and speed rating.
with wet traction being a primary concern.
I don't want anyone to think I am saying the OEM BRP tire is not a good, viable option. Just that there are probably better choices (though few) out there that can be considered without warrany or other issues. The manufacturer give us 1 option, I like to consider all of my options and chose based on reasonable criteria.
Shop Ph: 423-609-7588 (M-F, 8-5, Eastern Time)
Only SLOW people have to leave on time...
-
In the past I heard that the Kumos are getting much better milage than stock as they are 4 ply tread and resist bulging for a more even wear pattern. The Falkens are designed for left or right application but acoording to what others have posted they do not work so well on the back tire. I am shopping for tires now and money is not the object. I want a tire that will equal the stock but wear evenly for increased milage between replacement, thoughts? My stock tire is worn out in the center at 10K. I will push it to 12 but I can already feel it loose grip on wet roads now.
-
Originally Posted by bluestratos
In the past I heard that the Kumos are getting much better milage than stock as they are 4 ply tread and resist bulging for a more even wear pattern. The Falkens are designed for left or right application but acoording to what others have posted they do not work so well on the back tire. I am shopping for tires now and money is not the object. I want a tire that will equal the stock but wear evenly for increased milage between replacement, thoughts? My stock tire is worn out in the center at 10K. I will push it to 12 but I can already feel it loose grip on wet roads now.
Where are you seeing negative reports on the Falken for the rear? In my research everybody seemed quite positive.
-
Originally Posted by BajaRon
Life has warranty implications. I don't ride to protect the warranty, I have the warranty to protect the ride.
If I put a tire on that has better wear, better dry traction, better wet traction and greater safety (4 ply tread vs. 2 ply tread) and otherwise meets BRP's minimum requirements, then they have to prove that it was the tire that caused the damage.
Some dealerships throw down the (It's not stock! Danger! Will Robinson ) card every time you get a bolt turned. Why? Because it is very effective.
I'm reading the discussion with interest...haven't even bought a yet and already know that I will get into it with the dealership....
-
-
car tyres
What is the problem with car tyres? As much as I like my RS SM I know it is not a motorcycle. I have been riding daily since 1968. Hondas, Yamahas, Suzukis, Kawasakis, BMW and even a Moto Martin. I have had 2 Goldwing sidecar outfits and an affair with an XS1100 outfit. In this time I have seen wobbly wire wheels with Avon SMs, Dunlop trigonics and all other trends. Any story that the Spyder needs motorcycle tyres is written by Hans Christian Anderson. The Spyder, she don`t lean!!! The Kenda, she don' t grip. If you want mileage fine. Stick with the Kenda. If you want grip so you just don't sit there spinning and going nowhere in a hurry look for another brand.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|