-
Very Active Member
Motorcycle prices
There is an interesting thread here about a 'New $10,000' Spyder. That got me to thinking - - - - (painful as it is)
In 191 Honda introduced the Honda 750/4 to the US. It cost $1,495. A new 1971 Ford LTD mid-range price was ~$3,500. So a top of the line Honda was ~43% the cost of a new large car.
So what would 43% of a large car be today? a 2019 Ford Taurus SEL is $30230. So a new Honda 750 should cost ~$12,912. Apparently, Honda does not have a 750/4 for sale but has the 1000. A new 2018 lists for $12,999.
DANG CLOSE!!!
Joe T.
Joe T.
I miss SoCal - - - -
-
Very Active Member
So since an RT is ~ 28 grand.... a new car would be over 60?
Trent - 2017 asphalt grey RT Limited,
Ultimate Seat, Baha Ron’s sway bar, Vredestine rear tire, Federal Formoza fronts, SlingMod’s LED head and fog lights, Lamonster’s highway pegs
HE>I
-
Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie
2013 RT Ltd Pearl White
Ryde More, Worry Less!
-
Originally Posted by Peter Aawen
Now d'ya think Honda have done that knowingly??!
I reckon there's a pretty good chance!
I thought that was called inflation or an I wrong. I have been wrong before. But the good thing is I never buy new.
-
Very Active Member
-
Very Active Member
Interesting....🤔
Looks like the %age is holding. No trikes back then to get a relation...
Gene and Ilana De Laney
Mt. Helix, California
2012 RS sm5
2012 RS sm5 , 998cc V-Twin 106hp DIY brake and park brake Classic Black
-
Active Member
Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator, the $1495 price of a Honda CB750 in 1971 is equivalent to $9,256.73 in 2018 dollars.
Now, working in the opposite direction, the $17999 base price of the cheapest 2018 Spyder model would have been $2,906.91 in 1971 — twice the cost of a CB750.
To give that some perspective, some other 1971 suggested retail prices:
- The new Ducati 750 GT — $1995
- Harley Davidson Super Glide — $2200
- Norton Commando Production Racer — $2499
No question about it, Spyders are comparatively expensive compared to other riding options, regardless of inflation.
Last edited by Tanshanomi; 08-24-2018 at 10:18 AM.
2013 RS-S SM5 [His] • 2021 RT Base [Hers] • 1977 Bultaco custom roadster • 1974 Harley-Davidson/Aermacchi 350 SS
-
Very Active Member
Sanity Check
Originally Posted by Tanshanomi
Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator, the $1495 price of a Honda CB750 in 1971 is equivalent to $9,256.73 in 2018 dollars.
Now, working in the opposite direction, the $17999 base price of the cheapest 2018 Spyder model would have been $2,906.91 in 1971 — twice the cost of a CB750.
To give that some perspective, some other 1971 suggested retail prices:
- The new Ducati 750 GT — $1995
- Harley Davidson Super Glide — $2200
- Norton Commando Production Racer — $2499
No question about it, Spyders are comparatively expensive compared to other riding options, regardless of inflation.
I was implying that the Spyder is a very high end product. The equivalent vehicle today would cost ~$60K - a new GMC Denali truck, for instance.
But, to further put the above quote in more perspective, I started to college in 1970. The first McDonalds I ever saw was in 1971. I still remember buying a Big Mac, fries (only small size then) and a Coke (medium size, I guess) was less than a dollar! Today, a Big Mac meal is $5.69. More than 6 times more expensive.
Joe T.
Joe T.
I miss SoCal - - - -
-
Very Active Member
So, based on these cost numbers, and experience owning a Spyder, is the value there at the price we pay, for a Can AM Spyder?
Granted that Honda is a lot less money, it is a Honda, so is it a better value?
If someone wants to take this further, compare old motocross bikes. They made a lot of Honda CR250s in the mid 70's vs the number of Can Am 250 motorcycles. Can Am was also a championship contender back then. Fast forward to today, the vintage Hondas always bring more money than the Can Ams, and ironically the Can Ams are a better restoration many times.
I wonder how all this compares in the watercraft, side by side and sled market.
-
Active Member
Originally Posted by PMK
If someone wants to take this further, compare old motocross bikes. They made a lot of Honda CR250s in the mid 70's vs the number of Can Am 250 motorcycles. Can Am was also a championship contender back then. Fast forward to today, the vintage Hondas always bring more money than the Can Ams, and ironically the Can Ams are a better restoration many times.
Hondas were more popular then and bring more money now because they were the better machine, period. Can-Am dirt bikes all possessed either explosive, uncontrollable power, or wonky, unpredictable handling — in any cases, both! In the hands of someone skilled and familiar with their quirks, they could keep up with the Japanese bikes on the track, but in the hands of the general public they were neither as easy to ride well nor as reliable. And I say all this as someone who personally has a keen affection for old Can-Am dirt bikes. You can't sugarcoat it; they were nowhere as good as the Hondas.
2013 RS-S SM5 [His] • 2021 RT Base [Hers] • 1977 Bultaco custom roadster • 1974 Harley-Davidson/Aermacchi 350 SS
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by Tanshanomi
Hondas were more popular then and bring more money now because they were the better machine, period. Can-Am dirt bikes all possessed either explosive, uncontrollable power, or wonky, unpredictable handling — in any cases, both! In the hands of someone skilled and familiar with their quirks, they could keep up with the Japanese bikes on the track, but in the hands of the general public they were neither as easy to ride well nor as reliable. And I say all this as someone who personally has a keen affection for old Can-Am dirt bikes. You can't sugarcoat it; they were nowhere as good as the Hondas.
Agree.
I still remain amazed at how a pristine Can Am just does not seem to pull the value in the vintage market, but a non original "restored" CR gets stupid money.
I suspect this same situation may or likely will happen with Spyders vs Goldwings.
-
Active Member
Originally Posted by PMK
I wonder how all this compares in the watercraft, side by side and sled market.
You piqued my curiosity and prompted me to do some digging. I looked at historical personal watercraft pricing. I chose the earliest sit-down models the year they were introduced, along with the cost of low-end models you can buy today. With the exception of the first "modern" Sea-Doo, introduced in '88, they all fall generally in the $7–8K range once adjusted for inflation, regardless of era.
Year |
Model |
Original MSRP |
Equiv. Cost today |
1968 |
Sea-Doo |
$995 |
$7185 |
1985 |
WetJet 428 |
$3495 |
$8170 |
1986 |
Jet Ski X-2 |
$3399 |
$7823 |
1987 |
Yamaha WaveJammer |
$3280 |
$7263 |
1988 |
Sea-Doo SP |
$4200 |
$8932 |
2018 |
Sea-Doo Spark HO* |
— |
$6999 |
2019 |
Yamaha EX |
— |
$6799 |
*I'm intentionally ignoring the deliberately ECU-crippled "base" Spark's $5399 price because BRP has all but publicly admitted that it's a bait-and-switch loss leader, which makes it a less representative example here.
2013 RS-S SM5 [His] • 2021 RT Base [Hers] • 1977 Bultaco custom roadster • 1974 Harley-Davidson/Aermacchi 350 SS
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|