Rider harassment?

[SPECTACUALR SPIDERMAN]

Yes... by all means.....obey your fascist overlords or else......…

I'll stick to what this little document called the US Constitution says:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

wow , you're still an a-hole. do you still support linda cockroach too?

[Bob Denman]

[johnsimion]

wow , you're still an a-hole. do you still support linda cockroach too?

I don't agree with Firefly but was it really necessary to disagree like this? Now I see that the rest of the thread has devolved into personal attacks, too. What a shame when people can't argue without attacking each other. Too bad -- up to then I was enjoying the conversation and the different points of view. It's kind of funny -- in an UNfunny, pathetic way -- to see these personal attacks on a fellow rider in a thread entitled, "Rider Harassment."

[Bob Denman]

[Lew L]

There is a " ignore " option. I use it and I think it has lowered my blood pressure a bit.

Lew L

[pegasus1300]

There is a " ignore " option. I use it and I think it has lowered my blood pressure a bit.

Lew L

I finally found that button and put some people on that list. But now I find when they show up in a thread I have to click on the show button and see what they are saying.

[BLUEKNIGHT911]

I finally found that button and put some people on that list. But now I find when they show up in a thread I have to click on the show button and see what they are saying.

I'm guessing on the number, but I may have the longest " IGNORE " list on this Forum ..... I always read what these folks have to say, because I believe knowledge is power ....... I use my list to remind myself that under NO circumstances will I ever Waste my time helping these people as I have done in the past. Now this may sound drastic to some and or mean. But I don't put them on my list without good cause ( at least to me ).......jmho ..... Mike

[SPECTACUALR SPIDERMAN]

i must be old fashioned, i don't need an ignore button. i don't read every thread and i don't read every post.

[Lew L]

I finally found that button and put some people on that list. But now I find when they show up in a thread I have to click on the show button and see what they are saying.

I know----- and I did for a bit. But I truly try to " ignore" these fine folks with their wimpy and childish comebacks. Strive to be helpful or funny or informative or at least interesting. Those on my " ignore" list usually are none of those.

Mike,
I wouldn't help them either



Lew L

[BLUEKNIGHT911]

I know----- and I did for a bit. But I truly try to " ignore" these fine folks with their wimpy and childish comebacks. Strive to be helpful or funny or informative or at least interesting. Those on my " ignore" list usually are none of those.

Mike,
I wouldn't help them either



Lew L

....great minds think alike .................Mike

[SPECTACUALR SPIDERMAN]

I don't agree with Firefly but was it really necessary to disagree like this? Now I see that the rest of the thread has devolved into personal attacks, too. What a shame when people can't argue without attacking each other. Too bad -- up to then I was enjoying the conversation and the different points of view. It's kind of funny -- in an UNfunny, pathetic way -- to see these personal attacks on a fellow rider in a thread entitled, "Rider Harassment."

I'm sorry don't burn the flag and then post it on youtube and expect people to be nice about it. If firefly believes in our
constitution then he has no problem with the first amendment and should not take offense if someone besides himself exercises that right.

[Bob Denman]

I'm sorry don't burn the flag and then post it on youtube and expect people to be nice about it. If firefly believes in our
constitution then he has no problem with the first amendment and should not take offense if someone besides himself exercises that right.

Al,
You're forgetting something: the First Amendment does not apply in here.
We either live by Lamont's rules: or we can go elsewhere.
And Personal Attacks are strictly forbidden.

[SPECTACUALR SPIDERMAN]

Al,
You're forgetting something: the First Amendment does not apply in here.
We either live by Lamont's rules: or we can go elsewhere.
And Personal Attacks are strictly forbidden.

Bob, you are right. I apologize for posting but not for thinking or saying it. next time i will pm firefly telling him he is a pigu yeh(phonetic mandarin) but i won't post it for public display.
sorry lamont.

[Lew L]

And now it's been said twice. Pretty sneaky on your part SS.

Lew L

Personally I like sarcasm better than just name-calling. It shows a better command of the language without using obtuse verbiage.

[Bob Denman]

"Tact: The ability to tell somebody to go to Hell; and having them look forward to the trip."

[Holly]

I don't agree with Firefly but was it really necessary to disagree like this? Now I see that the rest of the thread has devolved into personal attacks, too. What a shame when people can't argue without attacking each other. Too bad -- up to then I was enjoying the conversation and the different points of view. It's kind of funny -- in an UNfunny, pathetic way -- to see these personal attacks on a fellow rider in a thread entitled, "Rider Harassment."

You can't blame them, they were taught to attack from CNN...……

[wyliec]

You can't blame them, they were taught to attack from CNN...……

I think they should get on twitter, and tweet their attacks.

[Rogue Hawk]

I think they should get on twitter, and tweet their attacks.

Can you imagine if a president ever did that?

[Bob Denman]

image060.jpeg