-
Originally Posted by tehrlich
LOL. You act like you're 8 years old.
You give him too much credit.
Responding to his posts just drags you into the mud too.
-
Originally Posted by tehrlich
Second generation Smart Cars weigh a minimum of 1653lbs. You can see this here.
They have a range of tire sizes, but their stock wheels and tires are similar to our fronts. Their recommended psi settings are 29 for the front and 36 for the rears. Here.
Close but still no cigar.
And you must remember you are missing a wheel which reduces traction even more.
additionally...they figure the weight as the "average" of additional passengers and cargo.
even those little Smart cars figure an average of passenger and cargo being 600-800lbs, something not close to a Spyder.
Show me a weight rating for a tire that not only shows close to a 1000lb car but missing a wheel, like a Spyder.
The Smart car is almost 1700lbs and has an extra tire, the math?
The Spyder is 33% lighter?
The Spyders missing tire reduces traction by 25%?
Any mathematicians out there wanna try to solve this math quiz?
-
Originally Posted by Road-Kill
Close but still no cigar.
So......53 posts into the thread and I forget what your recommendation is for tires ?
The stock Kendra's ??
And what does the Slingshot use for tires ?
Yes, I understand that it is not IDENTICAL but close is often good enough........despite protestations to the contrary.
Last edited by Easy Rider; 01-01-2018 at 10:45 AM.
-
Very Active Member
-
Very Active Member
Originally Posted by Road-Kill
Close but still no cigar.
And you must remember you are missing a wheel which reduces traction even more.
additionally...they figure the weight as the "average" of additional passengers and cargo.
even those little Smart cars figure an average of passenger and cargo being 600-800lbs, something not close to a Spyder.
Show me a weight rating for a tire that not only shows close to a 1000lb car but missing a wheel, like a Spyder.
The Smart car is almost 1700lbs and has an extra tire, the math?
The Spyder is 33% lighter?
The Spyders missing tire reduces traction by 25%?
Any mathematicians out there wanna try to solve this math quiz?
I only put the Smart Car information up because it is the only thing close to what we are running.
But a nitpick in your math... our rear tire is bigger than the Smart Car tires. I'll let you work that through your HP calculator, but until you actually ride with car tires, you REALLY don't know what you are missing. Why do you think so many on this forum replace them?
Not science, but do a search on this popular forum. Look for anecdotal evidence of your claims. Look for actual claims of:
"holy s.....t.... my car tires are making me spin out on wet roads!" See what you find for us and report.
Last edited by tehrlich; 01-01-2018 at 10:58 AM.
2015 RT Limited: Fox Shocks - RonJon swaybar and links - BRP Comfort Seat - BRP Triaxis handlebars - Yokohama tires (26psi fronts 28psi back) - Centramatic wheel balancers - BRP belt tensioner - BRP Short windshield - CATdelete/Spyder1 attitude exhaust - Lamonster footpegs - sintered brake pads - LED TRYCLED lights - BumpSkid
-
Originally Posted by tehrlich
I only put the Smart Car information up because it is the only thing close to what we are running.
But a nitpick in your math... our rear tire is bigger than the Smart Car tires. I'll let you work that through your HP calculator, but until you actually ride with car tires, you REALLY don't know what you are missing. Why do you think so many on this forum replace them?
Not science, but do a search on this popular forum. Look for anecdotal evidence of your claims. Look for actual claims of:
"holy s.....t.... my car tires are making me spin out on wet roads!" See what you find for us and report.
I was simply asking for the hard data, the math or any actual testing done.
I see none of that.
I see thread after thread of what people "think" is best.
Last edited by Road-Kill; 01-01-2018 at 03:54 PM.
-
Very Active Member
It's funny how a single thread can bring out the bad in all. No matter what you type, post stats,etc it will not change a persons mind. That is why I stated I like 17 lbs for me. Might not be what you like so run what you feel is right for you. So when people ask a question that doesn't know it's best to tell them to try different pressures until the find their sweat spot. JMO and I'm sticking to it
Happy New Year, David
-
SpyderLovers Sponsor
-
-
Originally Posted by Road-Kill
<snip>
The Spyders missing tire reduces traction by 25%?
Any mathematicians out there wanna try to solve this math quiz?
I'm no mathematician but think that last statement is not mathematically correct. Say a Spyder did have two rear tires, at the same total overall weight. The rear-end footprint would be doubled, but the downward PSI would be halved... an exact wash.
The total coefficient of friction (traction) would probably change some, but methinks nowhere near 25% (50% on rear axle...).
NEW - 2015 RT Limited SE6 Intense Red Pearl - 07/21/15
Retained the old mirrors with TricLed Signals
General Altimax RT43 rear tire (at...17,000 miles) Ran for 36,500 miles
Michelin Defender.......rear tire (at...53,500 miles) Ran for 60,700 miles
Riken Raptor HR.........rear tire (at 114,200 miles)
Vredestein Quatrac 5 front tires (at 70,500 miles, first new fronts!)
Gear Brake Decelerometer Module
OLD - 2012 RT Limited SE5 Pearl White - 01/31/13 - Traded in at 32,600 miles.
BajaRon Anti-sway Bar
Kumho ECSTA AST rear tire (at 14,200 miles)
TricLed Turn Signals in Mirrors
-
-
SpyderLovers Sponsor
Originally Posted by missouriboy
I'm no mathematician but think that last statement is not mathematically correct. Say a Spyder did have two rear tires, at the same total overall weight. The rear-end footprint would be doubled, but the downward PSI would be halved... an exact wash.
The total coefficient of friction (traction) would probably change some, but methinks nowhere near 25% (50% on rear axle...).
I have not done the math but I strongly suspect that you are correct. There are a number of factors at work here.
First, by going to 1 rear wheel you lose the stability that you gain with 2 wheels spread apart.
Second, you are replacing 2 narrow tires with 1 wide tire. While the total footprint may be a bit less with 1 wide tire. The overall traction coefficient may not be all that different.
Third, as mentioned. The pounds per square inch down-force will go down as the footprint area goes up which also affects actual traction.
I don't think it is as simple as 4 minus 1 = a 25% loss. I suspect that it is a much smaller percentage on our Spyders.
Interestingly enough. A stronger sway bar actually transfers some of the excessive down-force on the front, outside tire, to the rear wheel in a turn. This increases not only the traction at the front of the Spyder. But also increases the traction at the rear at the same time. Only in a turn however, as this is the only time a sway bar has effect on handling.
There are, of course, disadvantages to having only 1 rear wheel. But there are also a great number of advantages. everything is a trade-off.
Last edited by BajaRon; 01-01-2018 at 03:37 PM.
Shop Ph: 423-609-7588 (M-F, 8-5, Eastern Time)
Only SLOW people have to leave on time...
-
An easy method would be to mount a desired tire on your Spyder and with the parking brake "on" pull your Spyder with gauge attached.
Do this for several different brands and let us know which tires require more pull to break traction.
If we could come up with a known gauge that everyone could obtain we could ask everyone to do this test.
Since there are many who already have different tires mounted we could acquire this info and close this discussion to facts.
-
Originally Posted by Road-Kill
I see thread after thread of what people "think" is best.
That's all that the people here have access to.
If the data you want even exists, it likely is not available to the general public........because some company paid for it and all of the results may not reflect favorably on the people paying to do the study.
-
Originally Posted by Road-Kill
If we could come up with ...................
What's this "WE" stuff ??
If it concerns YOU that much, then go for it.
Let us know what you find out.
-
Very Active Member
I run 19PSI in the front tires( Continental Contiprocontact's) on my 2014RTS-SE6.
I have not had any problems.
Deanna
Current Spyder - 2023 F3 LTD Special Mineral Blue
Red LED NANO Saddlebag Marker Lights with Full Illumination
Sequential Fender LED'S (Amber/Red) with Safety Reflector
Dual Power Plate (12 V & USB ports)
Gremlin Bell
Rear Trunk Organizer (4 holders, 2 Elastic Holders)
Lamonster "Top Cuff" with adjustable drink Holder
SpyderPops Missing Guard Belt
Console Accent Trim (Carbon Fiber Domed Black)
Ultimate F3 Floorboards
Front Fairing Service Access Door Covers (Carbon Fiber Doomed Black)
Sway Bar with Links
Rolo Laser Alignment
Half Cover
A-Arm Daytime Dual Color LED Running Lights with Blinker Module
Hi-Viz DRL and Sequential Mirrors lights
Former Spyder - 2014 RTS SE6 Cognac SOLD
-
Active Member
This horse has been dead for some time now. It doesn't matter if your an educated pro or a seat of the pants type it doesn't make anybody's opinion better or worse than the next or right or wrong. Use what makes you warm and fuzzy and ride more and stress less.
I personally tried pressures all over the place and finally gave up on the spyder and moved on. The handling was never going make me happy or make the spyder something it's not.
-
Very Active Member
Personally, I don't care what people are running for psi.
What I do care about is loud-mouth-know-it-alls hammering anyone that has a different viewpoint. Their claims of superiority aren't really backed up except by grandiose claims and emoji abuse.
This is really what keeps this stupid topic going.
2015 RT Limited: Fox Shocks - RonJon swaybar and links - BRP Comfort Seat - BRP Triaxis handlebars - Yokohama tires (26psi fronts 28psi back) - Centramatic wheel balancers - BRP belt tensioner - BRP Short windshield - CATdelete/Spyder1 attitude exhaust - Lamonster footpegs - sintered brake pads - LED TRYCLED lights - BumpSkid
-
Very Active Member
-
Very Active Member
Why do you think I was referring to you?
LOL
2015 RT Limited: Fox Shocks - RonJon swaybar and links - BRP Comfort Seat - BRP Triaxis handlebars - Yokohama tires (26psi fronts 28psi back) - Centramatic wheel balancers - BRP belt tensioner - BRP Short windshield - CATdelete/Spyder1 attitude exhaust - Lamonster footpegs - sintered brake pads - LED TRYCLED lights - BumpSkid
-
Very Active Member
Huh
-
Very Active Member
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific.
2019 Specialized E-Bike COMO 2.0
2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland
2018 Tiffin Phaeton 37BH Motorhome
2015 BMW R1200R LC
2014 RTL SE6 Pearl White
2012 RT-622 trailer viper red
2014 Look 7x12 motorcycle trailer silver and black
2011 Polaris Ranger green
2013 GMC Yukon Denali XL silver oak
2016 Can Am Maverick
-
Beating a Dead Horse.jpg
Can we move on to the oil and helmet fistfights now?
-
Active Member
WHAT....?????
Richard
* 2012 RS SE5 (hers)
* 2013 ST SM5 (mine)
Daughter RSS SE5 2014
Son in law RSS SM5 2013
P.S. 3 Kumho AST 225/50R15 and 1 Toyo Proxies 4 225/50R15 rear tires
2 sets of Kumho 175/55R15 front tires
1 set of Hankook V4
1 set of Canadian Tire General tire Evertrek RTX in 14" for the 2012 ...
-
Originally Posted by Richardv
"19 in the front cause I installed the Baja Ron sway bar which eased up on the steering effort." Since when does a sway bar, help in turning a steering....??????? !!!!! ..... this statement out of the mouth of an expert.....!!!!! wow
I said the same thing before I installed Baja Rons sway bar.
Contact him and he will explain how improving the angle improves steering.
Your response is "a bit" over the top but its ok.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|