http://www.motorcycle.com/manufactur...de-review.html
Printable View
I'm not a hater nor are others I'm sure but when these machines are thrown at us as competition or better than our spyder we become defensive...and often explain the difference and the fact they don't fit in our catagory. I wish them luck. SO!! are you in line to get one...??.;)
I am sincere when I say I WAS seriously considering getting one as soon as they hit the showroom. However during a recent visit to the local Yamaha/Can Am dealership a 2017 Yamaha FZ-10 caught my eye. It had been on the showroom floor for a few months and the dealer was willing to make a good deal to get it gone. So the Niken is no longer in my future but I was one of those people Yamaha had in mind when they developed the bike. As to the FZ-10, I absolutely love it. It is relatively comfortable, 3 riding modes, 3 traction control settings, ABS and cruise control. And did I say fast? Yeah, 998cc inline 4 from the R1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chupaca
The engineering is superb, I'm sure the quality is great, the ride and drive sound fantastic -- but I can't look at that thing without thinking, "Could they have made it any uglier?" If there are enough sold, surely somebody will come up with some kind of fairing to cover up at least part of that hideous front end. The Piaggio MP3 is breathing a sigh of relief, no longer the ugliest 3-wheeler on the planet.
Its not pretty but I don't buy bikes for that, I've even had a Honda GL650 when I was dispatching - For those who don't know, that's a version of the infamous 'plastic maggot' with a huge ugly fairing.
The power outputs a bit better than the RS and looking at the max power and torque figures its a rev happy engine which I do like. Proper bike sitting position as well, none of the feet forward malarkey. The bars are too high and back but can probably be altered.
So with BRP still not having an RS replacement I'll be taking one for a test ride when they finally arrive on this little island.
Looks like two bikes got married.
I think that the use of the word "hater" is a bit strong for conversation purposes on this topic.
I don't really see the point of the comparison. The wheels are too close together to offer the stability and control of the the Spyder, therefore I would have to discount it.
I give them stars for the ability to lean, for those that want a touch more stability, but want to keep the "leaner bike" in their wheelhouse, no pun intended.
Hey, the diversity of offerings in the market is what makes for interesting dialogue and reasons to converse with someone. I am VERY certain that there is a market for this bike, just not for me, but I don't hate it either.
Joe
A bit heavy for it's engine size but i guess dual wheels will do that
I agree with "Buckeye"...
It's not a bike that I would ride; I still find it to be interesting! :thumbup:
Just thoughts - possibilities etc., Looks aside ( I don't like it ) .... I have some concerns about what could happen if one of the front tires hits a decent size rock ..... I know the industry have come a long way in the area of suspensions , especially the front. But I have doubts they can maintain optimum traction with that set-up....As I said when one tire hits a rock I think the other tire is going to break contact with the road surface , even if it's just for a mille-second. I don't think that's optimum. And I think with a knowledgeable expert Spyder rider ....the spyder would be faster .....jmho .... Mike :thumbup:
I agree with most who replied to this thread. Yes, there is a market for this reverse trike. But , I do not think it will appeal to most Spyder riders. I luv my RT Spyder, rode a regular two wheeled Honda 20 years ago, crashed and burned.
Now I'm 55, enjoy the stability of the RT, braking on the RT, comfortability for my wife on the RT, look and design of my RT, no need to hold my bike up at stop signs. For those who chose the Spyder the thrill of leaning into curves is passe'. I enjoy the ride.
I agree with so many others in stating that it is no prom queen. But I said that when ford changed the ranger in 93 (I bought a 94), when they changed the f-150 in 97 (I bought a 97 and currently have an 02), when they changed the fox body mustang front end in 87 (I bought an 87 LX 5.0), and in 2015 when can am came out with the ugly front on the F3 (I currently have a 2016 F3T).
So, you can bet that I will definitly be in line to give one a test drive when the Yamaha demo truck pulls into my town.
I'VE SEEN 'ROAD KILL' THAT IS MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN THAT THING......
sorry pal, we all have different likes and dislikes.... let us know how you like yours...
Dan P
SPYD3R
If it doesn't lock when it is upright and coming to a stop, then what good is a 3 wheeled bike?
This is not competition to our Spyders.
It is a three wheeled motorcycle that will appeal to a different rider.
No storage, thus it's not a touring machine as most of us view our Spyders.
Not a hater, but..., not a liker either. It's all about different strokes for different folks. Just not me. :thumbup:
Yeah, we’re all different, Piston;) I wouldn’t buy one BECAUSE of the feet tucked back under me. The high bars would be no issue ;):D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by PistonBlown
Pete
As it doesn't lock in the upright position & has a 32.5" seat height I am afraid I would be spending a lot of time trying to pick it up off its side. I have no problem with its looks.
I don't hate any bike, reverse trike, trike or cyclecar, as a member of AMA. I am just very happy that everyone who rides is riding. This motorcycle is not for me, but if it is your ride, have a blast riding.
I was thinking the same thing when they arrive here in OctoberQuote:
Originally Posted by PistonBlown
Sorry to burst your bubble but the best, most skilled Spyder rider in the world could not beat the Niken on any road course providing the Niken rider was of equal skill and providing both machines were stock.Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEKNIGHT911
Did you even read the article? Your answer is there and is explained very well.Quote:
Originally Posted by bscrive
I trust you're referring to some other comment in the article and not this one?Quote:
Originally Posted by dndfindley
Quote:
Unlike the Piaggio MP3, there’s no locking device to hold you upright; you have to put a foot down at stops.
I think it’s just the usual written English misinterpretations, Idaho. DND is responding in general terms to “what good is a 3 wheel bike” (i.e safer in corners if you hit a gravel patch etc), and not the specifically mentioned concern of “it doesn’t lock when it’s upright and coming to a stop, so what good is it?”;)Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoMtnSpyder
Pete
On really bendy roads the Spyder does have some advantages over a bike. You can often brake later, uneven road surfaces in the corners are not an issue, and you can push the tires to the limit without worrying what will happen if it does let go.Quote:
Originally Posted by dndfindley
It also has disadvantages. Its physically harder ride hard in the bends and you lack the acceleration coming out the corners.
I can ride a motorbike faster through the mountains than a Spyder but I enjoy the Spyder more because I can push it to its limit without worrying. Though the Spyder is more physically demanding (well the way I ride it:-)), I find it less mentally exhausting, which is why I find my Spyder makes a great endurance rally 'bike'.
What's going to be interesting with the Nikon is if it ticks both boxes i.e. less physically demanding but with the extra safety net. One concern I have is the braking because they do mention it not being so good in the article. I would have assumed the extra rubber on the road, electronics etc should have meant they could have very good braking. Suggests that compromises may have been made to soften the experience, similar to Spyders having a low-spec sway bar as standard but brakes are harder to improve.
The first thing I thought of when I looked at the picture was, "man, keeping that thing in good rubber is going to be expensive!"
When I had my BMW, I winced at the cost of new tires, and their relatively (to a Spyder) short life span. Good two-wheel motorcycle tires ain't cheap. I so glad I can now go several years without worrying about new tires!
Yes, I am referring to other comments in reference to the reason for a motorcycle that leans and has 2 wheels up front.Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoMtnSpyder
good write up in Cycle World.
Seems the Niken is not a trike but classified as a motorcycle.
And it's not for beginners
https://www.cycleworld.com/surprise-...e053118#page-8
This isn’t a mobility scooter, it?s a sport touring bike with huge front end grip and real motorcycle power and mileage.
This isn't a mobility scooter, it's a sport touring bike with huge front end grip and real motorcycle power and mileage.Quote:
Originally Posted by bscrive
Lol - a Spyder can’t outrun my 2016 F150 on a twisty road, the Niken will perform as well or better as most sport bikes on a twisty road.Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEKNIGHT911
So Yamaha invented a 3 legged motorcycle that still needs a kick stand?
yepQuote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
motorcycles have kick stands, trikes don't